首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects >In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy shaping ability preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars
【2h】

In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy shaping ability preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars

机译:连续磨牙往复磨牙和手动磨牙在清洁磨牙中的清洁效果成形能力制备时间和锉变形的体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Efficient canal preparation is the key to successful root canal treatment. This study aimed to assess the cleaning and shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of rotary, reciprocating and manual instrumentation in canal preparation of primary molars.>Methods. The mesiobuccal canals of 64 extracted primary mandibular second molars were injected with India ink. The samples were randomly divided into one control and three experimental groups. Experimental groups were instrumented with K-file, Mtwo in continuous rotation and Reciproc in reciprocating motion, respectively. The control group received no treatment. The files were discarded after four applications. Shaping ability was evaluated using CBCT. After clearing, ink removal was scored. Preparation time and file fracture or deformation was also recorded. Data were analyzed with SPSS 19 using chi-squared, Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05.>Results. Considering cleanliness, at coronal third Reciproc was better than K-file (P < 0.001), but not more effective than Mtwo (P = 0.080). Furthermore, Mtwo leaved the canal cleaner than K-file (P = 0.001). In the middle third, only Reciproc exhibited better cleaning efficacy than K-file (P = 0.005). In the apical third, no difference was detected between the groups (P = 0.794). Regarding shaping ability, no differences were found between Reciproc and Mtwo (P = 1.00). Meanwhile, both displayed better shaping efficacy than K-file (P < 0.05). Between each two groups, there were differences in preparation time (P < 0.05), with Reciproc being the fastest. No file failure occurred.>Conclusion. Fast and sufficient cleaning and shaping could be achieved with Mtwo and especially with Reciproc.
机译:>背景。 有效的根管准备是成功治疗根管的关键。本研究旨在评估旋转,往复和手动器械在磨牙准备中的清洁和成形能力,准备时间和锉形变形。>方法。将64颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙的近颊管切入。注入印度墨水。将样品随机分为一个对照组和三个实验组。实验组分别配备K档,Mtwo连续旋转和Reciproc往复运动。对照组未接受治疗。在四次申请后,这些文件被丢弃。使用CBCT评估成形能力。清除后,对油墨去除进行评分。还记录了准备时间和锉刀断裂或变形。数据使用SPSS 19进行卡方检验,Fisher精确检验,Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后检验,显着性水平为0.05。>结果。考虑到清洁度,冠状位第三次Reciproc优于K-文件(P <0.001),但没有比Mtwo(P = 0.080)更有效。此外,Mtwo离开了比K型锉刀更清洁的管道(P = 0.001)。在中间三分之一处,只有Reciproc的清洁效果优于K锉(P = 0.005)。在根尖的第三者中,两组之间未发现差异(P = 0.794)。关于塑形能力,在Reciproc和Mtwo之间没有发现差异(P = 1.00)。同时,两者均显示出比K型锉更好的塑形效果(P <0.05)。两组之间的准备时间有所不同(P <0.05),其中Reciproc最快。没有发生文件故障。>结论。使用Mtwo尤其是Reciproc可以实现快速,充分的清洁和整形。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号