首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects >Sealing Efficacy of Single-cone Obturation Technique with MTA and CEM Cement: An in Vitro Bacterial Leakage Study
【2h】

Sealing Efficacy of Single-cone Obturation Technique with MTA and CEM Cement: An in Vitro Bacterial Leakage Study

机译:MTA和CEM水泥封闭单锥密封技术的功效:一项体外细菌泄漏研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and aims. Various materials and methods have been introduced for obturating cleaned and shaped root canal systems. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the sealing ability of single-cone obturation technique with mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium-enriched mixture based on bacterial leakage approach.>Materials and methods. Sixty-four single-canal teeth were prepared and randomly divided into 5 groups, consisting of three experimental groups (n = 16) and two control groups (n = 8).In group 1, root canal obturation was performed using gutta-percha with 0.02 taper and AH26 sealer by lateral compaction technique. In groups 2 and 3, single Protaper gutta-percha cone was used for obturation with MTA and CEM cement, respectively. A bacterial leakage apparatus was utilized for leakage assessment for 60 days. Leakage comparison between the experimental groups was performed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 16 statistical software.>Results. The mean bacterial leakage intervals in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 33.68 ± 9.39, 40.68 ± 11.03 and 39.56 ± 9.03 days, respectively. One-way ANOVA indicated no significant differences in bacterial leakage between the three experimen-tal groups (P = 0.109).>Conclusion. Single-cone obturation with well-fitted gutta-percha and MTA and CEM cement is an appropriate alternative for traditional lateral compaction technique.
机译:>背景和目标。已经引入了各种材料和方法来封闭清洁和成形的根管系统。这项体外研究旨在通过细菌渗漏方法评估三矿物质骨料和富钙混合物对单锥封闭技术的密封能力。>材料和方法。有64只单管牙齿制备并随机分为5组,由3个实验组(n = 16)和两个对照组(n = 8)组成。在第1组中,使用0.02锥度的牙胶-胶和AH26封闭剂通过侧向压实进行根管封闭技术。在第2组和第3组中,分别使用单个Protaper牙胶-锥盆分别用MTA和CEM水泥封闭。利用细菌泄漏设备进行泄漏评估60天。使用SPSS 16统计软件通过单因素方差分析进行实验组之间的泄漏比较。>结果。第1、2和3组的平均细菌泄漏间隔为33.68±9.39、40.68±11.03和39.56。分别为±9.03天。单向方差分析表明,三个实验组之间的细菌渗漏没有显着差异(P = 0.109)。>结论。采用适当的牙胶和MTA和CEM水泥进行单圆锥形充填传统侧向压实技术的合适替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号