首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Analysis of Randomized Cross-Over Study Comparing Two Infusion Sets for CSII in Daily Life
【2h】

Analysis of Randomized Cross-Over Study Comparing Two Infusion Sets for CSII in Daily Life

机译:分析随机对照研究比较日常生活中CSII的两种输液方式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an article in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Freckmann et al report an evaluation of 2 infusion sets used for CSII in daily life, both from Roche. Because the 2 catheters differed at the soft cannula level in terms of geometry and introducer needle, focus was made on pain at insertion. While no significant difference was noted on this primary endpoint, unplanned catheter changes occurred in close to 20% of cases also with both catheter models, mainly driven by apparent insulin delivery issues. Since kinked cannulas were not frequent, there is a clear need for better understanding of “unexplained hyperglycemia” as the main reason for reduction of catheter lifetime. Fixing this weak aspect of CSII becomes crucial while moving toward closed-loop insulin delivery.
机译:Freckmann等人在《糖尿病科学与技术杂志》上的一篇文章中报告了罗氏公司对两种用于CSII的日常生活用输液器的评估。由于这两个导管在软套管水平上在几何形状和导引针方面有所不同,因此重点放在插入时的疼痛上。尽管在这一主要终点上未发现明显差异,但两种导管模型在近20%的病例中均发生了计划外的导管更换,这主要是由明显的胰岛素输送问题引起的。由于弯折的插管并不常见,因此显然需要更好地理解“无法解释的高血糖症”,这是缩短导管寿命的主要原因。朝着闭环胰岛素输送的方向发展,修复CSII的这一薄弱环节变得至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号