首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >The Effectiveness of Service Delivery Initiatives at Improving Patients’ Waiting Times in Clinical Radiology Departments: A Systematic Review
【2h】

The Effectiveness of Service Delivery Initiatives at Improving Patients’ Waiting Times in Clinical Radiology Departments: A Systematic Review

机译:服务提供计划对改善临床放射科患者等待时间的有效性:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We reviewed the literature for the impact of service delivery initiatives (SDIs) on patients’ waiting times within radiology departments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, INSPEC and The Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1995 and February, 2013. The Cochrane EPOC risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias on studies that met specified design criteria. Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The types of SDI implemented included extended scope practice (ESP, three studies), quality management (12 studies), productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs, 29 studies), multiple interventions (11 studies), outsourcing and pay-for-performance (one study each). The uncontrolled pre- and post-intervention and the post-intervention designs were used in 54 (95 %) of the studies. The reporting quality was poor: many of the studies did not test and/or report the statistical significance of their results. The studies were highly heterogeneous, therefore meta-analysis was inappropriate. The following type of SDIs showed promising results: extended scope practice; quality management methodologies including Six Sigma, Lean methodology, and continuous quality improvement; productivity-enhancing technologies including speech recognition reporting, teleradiology and computerised physician order entry systems. We have suggested improved study design and the mapping of the definitions of patient waiting times in radiology to generic timelines as a starting point for moving towards a situation where it becomes less restrictive to compare and/or pool the results of future studies in a meta-analysis.
机译:我们回顾了有关服务提供计划(SDI)对放射科内患者等待时间的影响的文献。我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,INSPEC和Cochrane库,以查找1995年至2013年2月之间发表的相关文章。使用Cochrane EPOC偏倚风险工具评估了达到指定设计标准的研究的偏倚风险。五十七项研究符合纳入标准。实施的SDI的类型包括扩大范围的实践(ESP,三项研究),质量管理(十二项研究),提高生产率的技术(PET,二十九项研究),多种干预措施(十一项研究),外包和按绩效付费(一项)研究每个)。 54项研究(95%)使用了不受控制的干预前后,干预后设计。报告质量很差:许多研究没有测试和/或报告结果的统计学意义。研究是高度异构的,因此荟萃分析是不合适的。下列类型的SDI显示出可喜的结果:扩大范围的实践;质量管理方法论,包括六西格码,精益方法论和持续质量改进;提高生产力的技术,包括语音识别报告,远程放射学和计算机医师订单输入系统。我们建议改进研究设计,并将放射学中患者等待时间的定义映射到通用时间线,以此作为迈向一种比较局面的起点,在这种情况下,比较和/或合并未来研究的结果变得不那么严格了。分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号