首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
【24h】

The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

机译:不同患者推荐系统的有效性缩短选修手术的等待时间:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455. The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics. The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.
机译:选择性手术的漫长等待时间对于许多公共资助的卫生系统很常见。高收入国家转诊系统的效率低于下降和中等收入国家。初级保健从业者在确定哪些患者提到外科医生并且可能代表改善这种情况的机会时发挥重要作用。通过传统的转介方法,手术诊所通常具有过度拥挤,非手术推荐,手术患者随后的等待时间更长。提高转介通信质量应导致更及时的接触和更好的选择性外科护理成本效益。本综述总结了在手术护理途径中初级护理转诊方法范围内的有效干预措施的研究证据,可能会缩短选修手术的等待时间。我们在2019年12月至2019年12月至2012年1月至2020年搜索了Pubmed,Embase,Scopus,科学和Cochrane图书馆数据库,用于2013年后发布的文章。资格标准包括成人患者的主要选修外科清单,不包括癌症相关的手术。随机和非随机对照研究都有资格。使用Robins-I,Amstar 2和Casp评估证据质量,适用于所用的研究方法。由于异质性,审查报告限于叙事综合。 Prospero注册号是CRD42019158455。电子搜索产生了7543条记录。最后,重复数据删除和全文筛查后,九篇文章被视为符合条件。符合条件的研究在设计,范围,报告的成果和整体质量方面众所周大,具有一项随机试验,两项准实验研究,两个纵向后续研究,三项系统评价和一个观察研究。所有六篇原始文章都基于高收入国家的推荐方法。附带的研究表明,患者分类和推荐阶段的优先级改善了及时访问,并增加了诊所患者的咨询次数。可用的学习包括各种干预措施,是中等至高高质量的研究。使用结构化推荐格式管理具有适当的Triaging和优先级的患者推荐可能在卫生系统中有效,以缩短专门在高收入国家的选修手工等待时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号