首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing
【2h】

DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing

机译:DICOM与HL7进行模态接口

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Digital modalities such as CT, MRI, Ultrasound and Computerized Radiography systems, generating softcopy images to be used by a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), need to identify the images properly in order to retrieve and manage them. In many cases, a technologist re-enters patient demographic and study related information at the modality, even although it is usually already present somewhere in the hospital Information System (IS). In order to achieve a higher level of efficiency and uniquely identify the created image objects, it is obvious that an interface between the IS and modality to exchange this information is highly desired. There are two options for a modality vendor to implement an IS interface, either using the Health Level (HL7) or Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM) communication standard. This paper will explain characteristics of both protocols, and demonstrate that it is preferred to use DICOM versus HL7. In addition, it will show that DICOM is, supported by most modality vendors, based on the result of a poll of their Modality Worklist versus HL7, support.
机译:诸如CT,MRI,超声和计算机射线照相系统之类的数字模态需要生成适当的图像以进行检索和管理,以生成供图像存档和通信系统(PACS)使用的软拷贝图像。在许多情况下,即使通常已经在医院信息系统(IS)中的某个位置出现,技术人员也会以这种方式重新输入患者的人口统计信息并研究相关信息。为了达到更高的效率并唯一地标识所创建的图像对象,很明显,非常需要IS与模态之间的接口来交换此信息。方式供应商可以使用健康级别(HL7)或医学数字成像通信(DICOM)通信标准来实现IS接口的两种选择。本文将解释这两种协议的特征,并证明使用DICOM和HL7是首选。此外,根据对Modality Worklist和HL7的支持调查,该结果将表明大多数模式供应商都支持DICOM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号