首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Drug Assessment >Understanding purchasing patterns and product access of newly launched specialty generics
【2h】

Understanding purchasing patterns and product access of newly launched specialty generics

机译:了解新推出的特种仿制药的购买模式和产品使用权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Many specialty drugs have lost patent exclusivity and more specialty generics (SGs) are expected in the future. Payers continue to look for ways to manage health care costs in the specialty pharmacy space and SG products offer the opportunity for savings. Given increasing interest in SGs, manufacturers are expected to invest more than $100 billion in the development of SGs over the next five years. To remain competitive, pharmacies must have access to SG products and access to competitive pricing for SGs, which can be obtained by accessing pharmaceutical manufacturer agreements through MHA Specialty Pharmacy Solutions. >Aims: Understand purchase patterns of newly launched SGs and see if increased access to product was facilitated by the entrance of a SG. >Methods: To determine purchase patterns of newly launched SGs, the rate of change of both the brand and generic products were measured for five specialty drugs across MHA pharmacy members. When possible, the brand rate was measured by the units of brand product purchased the quarter prior to the generic launch compared to the number of units in first quarter 2019 (1Q19). The generic product rate was measured by the units of generic product in the quarter it launched compared to units in 1Q19. To detect changes in product access to SGs, the number of corporations dispensing the brand was measured in the quarter prior to the generic launch compared with the number of corporations dispensing the generic in 1Q19. >Results: Brand imatinib (Gleevec) number of units decreased 80% while generic imatinib units grew by 134%. The number of corporations dispensing generic imatinib increased 34%. Brand hydroxyprogesterone caproate (OHPC) (Makena) number of units decreased 67% while generic OHPC units grew by 641%. The number of corporations dispensing generic OHPC increased 38%. Brand abiraterone acetate (Zytiga) number of units decreased 63% while generic abiraterone units grew by 289%. The number of corporations dispensing generic abiraterone increased 60%. Brand tetrabenazine (Xenazine) and brand dalfampridine ER (Ampyra) could not be measured due to limited distribution. Generic tetrabenazine units increased 2967% and the number of corporations dispensing increased 2114%. Generic dalfampridine ER units increased 1451% and the number of corporations dispensing increased 463%. >Conclusions: Pharmacies purchasing through MHA Specialty Pharmacy Solutions are able to expand their access to products and quickly adopt SGs in order to grow their businesses and serve patients.
机译:>背景:许多特种药物已经失去专利独占性,预计将来会有更多的特种仿制药(SGs)。支付者继续在专业药房中寻找管理医疗费用的方法,而SG产品则为您提供了节省的机会。鉴于对SG的兴趣日益增加,预计制造商在未来五年内将投资超过1000亿美元用于SG的开发。为了保持竞争力,药房必须拥有SG产品和SG的竞争性定价,这可以通过MHA Specialty Pharmacy Solutions查阅制药厂商协议来获得。 >目标:了解新推出的销售服务提供商的购买方式,并查看是否由于销售服务提供商的加入而促进了对产品的获取。 >方法:要确定新推出的销售服务包的购买方式,需要对MHA药房成员中的五种特殊药物的品牌和非专利产品的变化率进行测量。在可能的情况下,品牌费率是根据通用发布前一个季度购买的品牌产品的单位与2019年第一季度(19年第一季度)的单位数量进行比较得出的。通用产品费率是根据其第一季度推出的通用产品的单位(与19年第一季度的单位相比)来衡量的。为了检测产品向SG的获取方式的变化,与通用品牌在19Q1发行的公司数量相比,在通用产品发布之前的一个季度中测量了分配品牌的公司数量。 >结果:品牌伊马替尼(Gleevec)单位数量减少80%,而通用伊马替尼单位增加134%。发放仿制药伊马替尼的公司数量增加了34%。己酸羟孕酮(OHPC)品牌(Makena)单位数量减少67%,而通用OHPC单位数量增加641%。分配通用OHPC的公司数量增加了38%。醋酸乙酸阿比特龙酯(Zytiga)单位数量下降63%,而通用阿比特龙酯单位数量增长289%。分配仿制药阿比特龙的公司数量增加了60%。由于分布有限,无法测量品牌丁苯那嗪(Xenazine)和品牌达芬普啶ER(Ampyra)。通用丁苯那嗪单位增加了2967%,配药公司数量增加了2114%。通用的达氟哌啶ER单元增加了1451%,配药的公司数量增加了463%。 >结论:通过MHA专业药房解决方案购买的药房能够扩大产品的使用范围,并迅速采用SG,从而发展业务并为患者服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号