首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Where We Look When We Drive with or without Active Steering Wheel Control
【2h】

Where We Look When We Drive with or without Active Steering Wheel Control

机译:当我们看看当我们用或不用主动方向盘控制驱动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current theories on the role of visuomotor coordination in driving agree that active sampling of the road by the driver informs the arm-motor system in charge of performing actions on the steering wheel. Still under debate, however, is the nature of visual cues and gaze strategies used by drivers. In particular, the tangent point hypothesis, which states that drivers look at a specific point on the inside edge line, has recently become the object of controversy. An alternative hypothesis proposes that drivers orient gaze toward the desired future path, which happens to be often situated in the vicinity of the tangent point. The present study contributed to this debate through the analyses of the distribution of gaze orientation with respect to the tangent point. The results revealed that drivers sampled the roadway in the close vicinity of the tangent point rather than the tangent point proper. This supports the idea that drivers look at the boundary of a safe trajectory envelop near the inside edge line. Furthermore, the study investigated for the first time the reciprocal influence of manual control on gaze control in the context of driving. This was achieved through the comparison of gaze behavior when drivers actively steered the vehicle or when steering was performed by an automatic controller. The results showed an increase in look-ahead fixations in the direction of the bend exit and a small but consistent reduction in the time spent looking in the area of the tangent point when steering was passive. This may be the consequence of a change in the balance between cognitive and sensorimotor anticipatory gaze strategies. It might also reflect bidirectional coordination control between the eye and arm-motor systems, which goes beyond the common assumption that the eyes lead the hands when driving.
机译:当前关于视觉运动协调在驾驶中的作用的理论认为,驾驶员对道路的主动采样会通知负责在方向盘上执行动作的机械臂系统。然而,仍在争论中的是驾驶员使用的视觉提示和注视策略的性质。尤其是切线点假设已成为争议的对象,该切线假设使驾驶员看到内侧边缘线上的特定点。另一种假设是,驾驶员将视线朝向期望的未来路径,该路径通常位于切线点附近。本研究通过分析相对于切点的凝视取向分布,为这一辩论做出了贡献。结果显示,驾驶员在切线点附近而不是正切点附近对道路进行了采样。这支持驾驶员在内部边缘线附近观察安全轨迹包络线的边界的想法。此外,该研究首次研究了在驾驶环境下手动控制对注视控制的相互影响。这是通过比较驾驶员主动转向车辆或由自动控制器执行转向时的凝视行为来实现的。结果表明,在转向处于被动状态时,在弯道出口方向上的前瞻性固定方式有所增加,而在切线点区域中花费的时间却很小却始终如一地减少。这可能是认知和感觉运动预期注视策略之间的平衡发生变化的结果。它也可能反映了眼睛与手臂-运动系统之间的双向协调控制,这超出了驾驶时眼睛会牵手的普遍假设。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Franck Mars; Jordan Navarro;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(7),8
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e43858
  • 总页数 6
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号