首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Bridging Prevention and Health: Exploring Community Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Honduras
【2h】

Bridging Prevention and Health: Exploring Community Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Honduras

机译:弥合预防和健康:探索社区对洪都拉斯农村的亲密合作伙伴暴力的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This qualitative study rooted in community-based participatory research principles utilized semi-structured interviews with 2 focus groups (n=9) with female healthcare volunteers (FCVs) and 3 male key informants who were community leaders (MCLs). The study aimed to examine how a rural Honduran community defines and responds to intimate partner violence (IPV) in order to lay the foundation for future interventions. Based on grounded theory, the authors assessed for common themes across transcripts. Authors found that a number of participants denied the existence of IPV. Perspectives on the causes and definitions of IPV varied between FCVs and MCLs. All participants affirmed the need for intervention and many participants mentioned healthcare and legal systems as potential venues to ameliorate IPV. The results highlight potentially important differences between FCV and MCL perspectives that may inform future interventions. Findings suggest health-care workers can play a role in IPV prevention and intervention in rural Honduras.
机译:这项定性研究扎根于基于社区的参与性研究原则,利用半结构化访谈,对2个焦点小组(n = 9)进行了女性医疗保健志愿者(FCV)和3位男性关键人物(社区领袖)的访谈。该研究旨在研究洪都拉斯农村社区如何定义和应对亲密伴侣暴力行为(IPV),从而为将来的干预打下基础。基于扎根的理论,作者评估了转录本中的共同主题。作者发现,许多参与者否认IPV的存在。在FCV和MCL之间,关于IPV的原因和定义的观点各不相同。所有与会者都确认需要干预,许多与会者提到医疗保健和法律制度是改善IPV的潜在场所。结果强调了FCV和MCL观点之间潜在的重要差异,可能会为将来的干预提供依据。调查结果表明,医护人员可在洪都拉斯农村地区的IPV预防和干预中发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号