首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Hemodynamic and psychological responses to laboratory stressors in women: Assessing the roles of menstrual cycle phase premenstrual symptomatology and sleep characteristics
【2h】

Hemodynamic and psychological responses to laboratory stressors in women: Assessing the roles of menstrual cycle phase premenstrual symptomatology and sleep characteristics

机译:对女性实验室压力源的血流动力学和心理反应:评估月经周期阶段前期症状和睡眠特征的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study assessed whether premenstrual symptomatology and/or sleep characteristics explain increased luteal phase psychophysiological reactivity to laboratory stressors. We hypothesized that: (1) premenstrual symptoms and sleep characteristics would explain greater luteal versus follicular phase psychophysiological reactivity, (2) symptoms and sleep characteristics would differentially predict psychophysiological reactivity within each cycle phase, and (3) symptoms and sleep characteristics would interact to affect luteal but not follicular reactivity. Freely cycling women (N=87) completed two laboratory sessions, one follicular (cycle days 5–9) and one luteal (days 7–10 post-ovulation). We employed two stressors: one physical (cold pressor task) and the other cognitive in nature (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task). During testing, electrocardiography monitored heart rate (HR) while a timed and auto-inflatable sphygmomanometer assessed blood pressure (BP). Participants also completed a one-time self-report measure of sleep characteristics and premenstrual symptomatology as well as a measure of state anxiety pre-post stressor. Results revealed greater luteal HR and systolic BP reactivity compared to follicular reactivity (p<0.001 for both analyses), however neither premenstrual symptoms nor sleep characteristics explained this luteal increase. Within cycle analyses revealed that symptoms and sleep characteristics interacted to affect luteal phase state anxiety reactivity (R2=.32, p=.002) with negative affect being associated with more reactivity when sleep hours were low (β=.333, p=.04). Overall, significant relationships existed during the luteal phase only. Findings are discussed in terms of clinical utility and methodological challenges related to performing laboratory stress testing in women.
机译:这项研究评估了经前症状和/或睡眠特征是否可以解释黄体期对实验室应激源的心理生理反应。我们假设:(1)经前症状和睡眠特征将解释黄体与卵泡期的心理生理反应性更高;(2)症状和睡眠特征将在每个周期阶段差异预测心理生理反应性;(3)症状和睡眠特征将与影响黄体但不影响卵泡反应性。自由骑行的妇女(N = 87)完成了两次实验室检查,一次卵泡(第5-9天的周期)和一次黄体(排卵后7-10天)。我们采用了两种压力源:一种是物理压力(冷压力任务),另一种是本质上的认知压力(听觉连续累加任务)。在测试过程中,心电图监测心率(HR),而定时自动充气血压计评估血压(BP)。参加者还完成了一项关于睡眠特征和经前症状的一次性自我报告测量,以及对压力后应激状态的测量。结果显示,与卵泡反应性相比,黄体HR和收缩压反应性更高(两种分析均p <0.001),但是经前症状和睡眠特征均不能解释这种黄体增加。在周期内分析显示,症状和睡眠特征相互作用影响黄体期状态焦虑反应性(R 2 =。32,p = .002),而睡眠时间低时,负面影响与更多的反应性相关( β= .333,p = .04)。总体而言,仅在黄体期存在重要关系。根据临床实用性和与妇女进行实验室压力测试有关的方法挑战对结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号