首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
【2h】

Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species

机译:土地刻面联动联动比较基础的设计基础上重点物种的设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Least-cost modeling for focal species is the most widely used method for designing conservation corridors and linkages. However, these designs depend on today's land covers, which will be altered by climate change. We recently proposed an alternative approach based on land facets (recurring landscape units of relatively uniform topography and soils). The rationale is that corridors with high continuity of individual land facets will facilitate movement of species associated with each facet today and in the future. Conservation practitioners might like to know whether a linkage design based on land facets is likely to provide continuity of modeled breeding habitat for species needing connectivity today, and whether a linkage for focal species provides continuity and interspersion of land facets. To address these questions, we compared linkages designed for focal species and land facets in three landscapes in Arizona, USA. We used two variables to measure linkage utility, namely distances between patches of modeled breeding habitat for 5–16 focal species in each linkage, and resistance profiles for focal species and land facets between patches connected by the linkage. Compared to focal species designs, linkage designs based on land facets provided as much or more modeled habitat connectivity for 25 of 28 species-landscape combinations, failing only for the three species with the most narrowly distributed habitat. Compared to land facets designs, focal species linkages provided lower connectivity for about half the land facets in two landscapes. In areas where a focal species approach to linkage design is not possible, our results suggest that conservation practitioners may be able to implement a land facets approach with some confidence that the linkage design would serve most potential focal species. In areas where focal species designs are possible, we recommend using the land facet approach to complement, rather than replace, focal species approaches.
机译:重点物种的最低成本建模是设计保护走廊和联系方式的最广泛使用的方法。但是,这些设计取决于当今的土地覆盖,而土地覆盖将因气候变化而改变。我们最近提出了一种基于土地面(地形和土壤相对均匀的重复景观单元)的替代方法。这样做的理由是,各个陆面具有高度连续性的走廊将促进当今和将来与各个陆面相关的物种的移动。养护从业者可能想知道,基于陆面的联系设计是否可能为当今需要联系的物种提供模拟繁殖栖息地的连续性,以及针对重点物种的联系是否提供陆面的连续性和散布性。为了解决这些问题,我们在美国亚利桑那州的三个景观中比较了为重点物种和陆地方面设计的联系。我们使用两个变量来测量连锁效用,即每个连锁中5–16个焦点物种的模拟繁殖栖息地斑块之间的距离,以及连锁联系之间的斑块之间的焦点物种和陆面的抗性概况。与重点物种设计相比,基于陆地小平面的链接设计为28个物种-景观组合中的25个提供了​​更多或更多的建模栖息地连通性,仅对栖息地分布最狭窄的三个物种失败。与陆面设计相比,焦点物种的联系为两个景观中约一半的陆面提供了较低的连通性。在不可能采用焦点物种方法进行链接设计的地区,我们的研究结果表明,保护从业人员可能能够实施土地分面方法,并充满信心地认为链接设计将服务于大多数潜在的焦点物种。在可能进行重点物种设计的地区,我们建议使用陆面方法来补充而非替代重点物种方法。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Brian M. Brost; Paul Beier;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(7),11
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e48965
  • 总页数 13
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号