首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Transmastoid galvanic stimulation does not affect the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human angular vestibulo-ocular reflex
【2h】

Transmastoid galvanic stimulation does not affect the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human angular vestibulo-ocular reflex

机译:Transmastoid电流刺激不会影响人类角度的介导的介导的增长介导的vertibulo-眼睛反射

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Vergence is one of several viewing contexts that require an increase in the angular vestibular-ocular reflex (aVOR) response. A previous monkey study found that the vergence-mediated gain (eye/head velocity) increase of the aVOR was attenuated by 64% when anodic currents, which preferentially lower the activity of irregularly firing vestibular afferents, were delivered to both labyrinths. We sought to determine if there was similar evidence implicating a role for irregular afferents in the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human aVOR. Our study is based upon analysis of the aVOR evoked by head rotations, delivered passively while subjects viewed a near (15cm) or far (124cm) target and applying galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) via surface electrodes. We tested 12 subjects during 2–3 sessions each. Vestibular stimuli consisted of passive whole-body rotations (sinusoids from 0.05 – 3Hz and 12 – 25°/s, and transients with peak ~15°, 50°/s, 500°/s2) and head-on-body impulses (peak ~30°, 150°/s, 3000°/s2). GVS was on for 10s every 20s. All polarity combinations were tested, with emphasis on uni- and bi-lateral anodic inhibition. The average stimulus current was 5.9 ± 1.6 mA (range: 3 – 9.5 mA), vergence angle (during near-viewing) was 22.6 ± 2.8° and slow phase eye velocity caused by left anodic current stimulation with head stationary was −3.4 ± 1.1°/s, −0.2 ± 0.6°/s and 2.5 ± 1.4°/s (torsion, vertical, horizontal). No statistically significant GVS effects were observed, suggesting that surface electrode GVS has no effect on the vergence-mediated gain increase of the aVOR at the current levels (~6 mA) tolerated by most humans. We conclude that clinically practical transmastoid GVS does not effectively silence irregular afferents and hypothesize that currents > 10mA are needed to reproduce the monkey results.
机译:融合是需要增加前庭眼角反射(aVOR)反应的几种观察环境之一。先前的一项猴子研究发现,当向两个迷宫输送阳极电流(优先降低不规则发射前庭传入的活动)的阳极电流时,aVOR的发散介导的增益(眼/头速度)增加会减弱64%。我们试图确定是否有类似的证据暗示不规则传入人在人aVOR的散度介导的增益增加中起作用。我们的研究基于对头部旋转引起的aVOR的分析,当受试者观察到近(15cm)或远(124cm)的目标并通过表面电极施加电前庭刺激(GVS)时进行被动传递。我们分别在2至3节中测试了12个主题。前庭刺激包括被动全身旋转(正弦波从0.05 – 3Hz和12 – 25°/ s,以及瞬态,峰值为〜15°,50°/ s,500°/ s 2 )和头部碰撞(峰值〜30°,150°/ s,3000°/ s 2 )。 GVS每20秒启动10秒。测试所有极性组合,重点是单侧和双侧阳极抑制。平均刺激电流为5.9±1.6 mA(范围:3 – 9.5 mA),发散角(近视时)为22.6±2.8°,由头部固定时左阳极电流刺激引起的慢相眼速度为-3.4±1.1 °/ s,-0.2±0.6°/ s和2.5±1.4°/ s(扭转,垂直,水平)。没有观察到统计学上显着的GVS效应,表明表面电极GVS在大多数人可以耐受的电流水平(〜6 mA)下对aVOR的介导的增益增加没有影响。我们得出的结论是,临床上可行的跨乳突GVS并不能有效地使不规则传入者沉默,并假设需要大于10mA的电流才能再现猴子的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号