首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study
【2h】

Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study

机译:一起导航潮流:在CBPR研究中部落和学术合作伙伴之间的早期合作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches stress the importance of building strong, cohesive collaborations between academic researchers and partnering communities; yet there is minimal research examining the actual quality of CBPR partnerships. The objective of the present paper is to describe and explore the quality of collaborative relationships across the first two years of the Healing of the Canoe project teams, comprised of researchers from the University of Washington and community partners from the Suquamish Tribe. Three quantitative/qualitative process measures were used to assess perceptions regarding collaborative processes and aspects of meeting effectiveness. Staff meetings were primarily viewed as cohesive, with clear agendas and shared communication. Collaborative processes were perceived as generally positive, with Tribal empowerment rated as especially important. Additionally, effective leadership and flexibility were highly rated while a need for a stronger community voice in decision-making was noted. Steady improvements were found in terms of trust between research teams, and both research teams reported a need for more intra-team project- and social-focused interaction. Overall, this data reveals a solid CBPR collaboration that is making effective strides in fostering a climate of respect, trust, and open communication between research partners.
机译:基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的方法强调了在学术研究人员与合作社区之间建立强有力的凝聚力合作的重要性。但是,很少有研究检查CBPR合作伙伴的实际质量。本文的目的是描述和探索“独木舟治愈”项目团队最初两年的协作关系质量,该团队由华盛顿大学的研究人员和Suquamish部落的社区合作伙伴组成。使用三种定量/定性过程度量来评估有关协作过程和会议有效性方面的看法。工作人员会议主要被视为具有凝聚力,议程清晰,交流共享。协作过程通常被认为是积极的,部落的赋权被认为尤为重要。此外,人们对有效的领导力和灵活性给予了高度评价,同时注意到在决策过程中需要更强大的社区声音。研究团队之间的信任度不断提高,两个研究团队都报告了需要更多的团队内部项目和社会关注的互动。总体而言,这些数据表明,CBPR开展了扎实的合作,在促进研究合作伙伴之间相互尊重,信任和开放交流的氛围方面正在取得有效进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号