首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized control pilot trial targeting sugar-sweetened beverage behaviors
【2h】

Mixed methods evaluation of a randomized control pilot trial targeting sugar-sweetened beverage behaviors

机译:混合方法评价随机控制试验试验靶向糖加饮料行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Excessive sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and low health literacy skills have emerged as two public health concerns in the United States (US); however, there is limited research on how to effectively address these issues among adults. As guided by health literacy concepts and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this randomized controlled pilot trial applied the RE-AIM framework and a mixed methods approach to examine a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intervention (SipSmartER), as compared to a matched-contact control intervention targeting physical activity (MoveMore). Both 5-week interventions included two interactive group sessions and three support telephone calls. Executing a patient-centered developmental process, the primary aim of this paper was to evaluate patient feedback on intervention content and structure. The secondary aim was to understand the potential reach (i.e., proportion enrolled, representativeness) and effectiveness (i.e. health behaviors, theorized mediating variables, quality of life) of SipSmartER. Twenty-five participants were randomized to SipSmartER (n=14) or MoveMore (n=11). Participants’ intervention feedback was positive, ranging from 4.2–5.0 on a 5-point scale. Qualitative assessments reavealed several opportunties to improve clarity of learning materials, enhance instructions and communication, and refine research protocols. Although SSB consumption decreased more among the SipSmartER participants (−256.9 ± 622.6 kcals), there were no significant group differences when compared to control participants (−199.7 ± 404.6 kcals). Across both groups, there were significant improvements for SSB attitudes, SSB behavioral intentions, and two media literacy constructs. The value of using a patient-centered approach in the developmental phases of this intervention was apparent, and pilot findings suggest decreased SSB may be achieved through targeted health literacy and TPB strategies. Future efforts are needed to examine the potential public health impact of a large-scale trial to address health literacy and reduce SSB.
机译:在美国,过量食用含糖饮料(SSB)和低健康素养技能已成为两个公共健康问题。然而,关于如何有效解决成年人中这些问题的研究还很有限。根据健康素养概念和计划行为理论(TPB)的指导,该随机对照试验采用RE-AIM框架和混合方法研究了含糖饮料(SSB)干预(SipSmartER),与针对身体活动的匹配接触控制干预(MoveMore)。这两个为期5周的干预措施包括两次互动小组会议和三个支持电话。执行以患者为中心的发展过程,本文的主要目的是评估患者对干预内容和结构的反馈。次要目的是了解SipSmartER的潜在覆盖面(即入学比例,代表性)和有效性(即健康行为,理论上的中介变量,生活质量)。 25名参与者被随机分配到SipSmartER(n = 14)或MoveMore(n = 11)。参与者的干预反馈是积极的,在5分制范围内为4.2–5.0。定性评估为改善学习材料的清晰度,加强说明和交流以及完善研究方案提供了许多机会。尽管SipSmartER参与者中的SSB消耗量下降得更多(−256.9±622.6 kcal),但与对照参与者相比(−199.7±404.6 kcal),组之间没有显着差异。在这两个群体中,SSB态度,SSB行为意图以及两种媒体素养结构都得到了显着改善。在这种干预的发展阶段使用以患者为中心的方法的价值显而易见,并且初步研究结果表明,可以通过针对性的健康素养和TPB策略来降低SSB。需要做进一步的努力来研究大规模试验对健康素养和减少SSB的潜在公共卫生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号