首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Tubal ligation hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study
【2h】

Tubal ligation hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study

机译:新英格兰病例对照研究中的输卵管结扎子宫切除术和上皮性卵巢癌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies have observed that tubal ligation and hysterectomy are associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer; however little is known about whether these associations vary bysurgical characteristics, individual characteristics, or tumor histology. We used logistic regression to examine tubal ligation, simple hysterectomy, and hysterectomy with unilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control study. Our primary analysis included 2,265 cases and 2,333 controls. Overall, tubal ligation was associated with a lower risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (OR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.68-0.97), especially for endometrioid tumors (OR=0.45, 95%CI: 0.29-0.69). The inverse association between tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk was stronger for women who had undergone the procedure at the time of last delivery (OR=0.60, 95%CI: 0.42-0.84) rather than at a later time (OR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.75-1.15). Overall, simple hysterectomy was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.83, 1.42), although it was associated with a non-significant decreased risk of ovarian cancer among women who underwent the procedure at age 45 or older (RR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.40, 1.02) or within the last 10 years (OR=0.65, 95%CI: 0.38, 1.13). Overall, women who had a hysterectomy with a unilateral oophorectomy had significantly lower risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.65, 95%CI: 0.45-0.94). In summary, tubal ligation and hysterectomy with unilateral oophorectomy were inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk in a large population-based case-control study. Additional research is necessary to understand the potential biologic mechanisms by which these procedures may reduce ovarian cancer risk.
机译:先前的研究已经观察到输卵管结扎术和子宫切除术与降低卵巢癌的风险有关。然而,关于这些关联是否因手术特征,个体特征或肿瘤组织学而变化知之甚少。在新英格兰病例对照研究中,我们使用逻辑回归分析检查了输卵管结扎,单纯子宫切除术和单侧卵巢切除术与上皮性卵巢癌风险之间的关系。我们的主要分析包括2,265例病例和2,333例对照。总体而言,输卵管结扎术具有较低的上皮性卵巢癌风险(OR:0.82,95%CI:0.68-0.97),特别是对于子宫内膜样肿瘤(OR = 0.45,95%CI:0.29-0.69)。输卵管结扎与卵巢癌风险之间的负相关性在上次分娩时接受手术的女性(OR = 0.60,95%CI:0.42-0.84)较晚时(OR = 0.93,95)更强%CI:0.75-1.15)。总体而言,简单的子宫切除术与卵巢癌风险无相关性(OR:1.09,95%CI:0.83,1.42),尽管与45岁或45岁以上的女性卵巢癌风险显着降低无关(RR:0.64,95%CI:0.40,1.02)或最近10年以内(OR = 0.65,95%CI:0.38,1.13)。总体而言,接受子宫切除术和单侧卵巢切除术的女性患卵巢癌的风险显着降低(OR = 0.65,95%CI:0.45-0.94)。总之,在一项基于人群的大型病例对照研究中,输卵管结扎和子宫切除联合单侧卵切除术与卵巢癌风险呈负相关。为了了解这些程序可能降低卵巢癌风险的潜在生物学机制,还需要进行其他研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号