首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation
【2h】

Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation

机译:经颅磁刺激导航的球形和逼真的边界元首模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveMRI-guided real-time transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) navigators that apply electromagnetic modeling have improved the utility of TMS. However, their accuracy and speed depends on the assumed volume conductor geometry. Spherical models found in present navigators are computationally fast but may be inaccurate in some areas. Realistically-shaped boundary-element models (BEMs) could increase accuracy at a moderate computational cost, but it is unknown which model features have the largest influence on accuracy. Thus, we compared different types of spherical models and BEMs.
机译:应用电磁建模的客观MRI引导的实时经颅磁刺激(TMS)导航仪提高了TMS的实用性。但是,它们的精度和速度取决于假定的体积导体几何形状。当前导航器中发现的球形模型计算速度较快,但在某些区域可能不准确。逼真的形状边界元素模型(BEM)可以以适度的计算成本来提高精度,但是尚不清楚哪个模型特征对精度的影响最大。因此,我们比较了不同类型的球形模型和BEM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号