首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Tragic Choices and Moral Compromise: The Ethics of Allocating Kidneys for Transplantation
【2h】

Tragic Choices and Moral Compromise: The Ethics of Allocating Kidneys for Transplantation

机译:悲剧性的选择和道德折衷:肾脏移植的伦理。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ContextFor almost a decade, the Kidney Transplantation Committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing has been striving to revise its approach to allocating kidneys from deceased donors for transplantation. Two fundamental values, equality and efficiency, are central to distributing this scarce resource. The prevailing approach gives primacy to equality in the temporal form of first-come, first-served, whereas the motivation for a new approach is to redeem efficiency by increasing the length of survival of transplanted kidneys and their recipients. But decision making about a better way of allocating kidneys flounders because it is constrained by the amorphous notion of “balancing” values.
机译:背景技术近十年来,器官共享联合网络的肾脏移植委员会一直在努力修改其方法,以分配已故捐赠者的肾脏进行移植。分配这种稀缺资源至关重要的是两个基本价值观,即平等和效率。流行的方法以先到先得的时间形式将平等放在首位,而新方法的动机是通过增加移植肾脏及其受体的生存时间来兑换效率。但是,做出有关分配肾脏比目鱼更好方法的决策是因为它受到“平衡”价值的无定形概念的约束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号