首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Computational Analysis of the Binding Specificity of Gleevec to Abl c-Kit Lck and c-Src Tyrosine Kinases
【2h】

Computational Analysis of the Binding Specificity of Gleevec to Abl c-Kit Lck and c-Src Tyrosine Kinases

机译:格列卫对Ablc-KitLck和c-Src酪氨酸激酶结合特异性的计算分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gleevec, a well-known cancer therapeutic agent, is an effective inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including Abl and c-Kit. But it displays less potency to inhibit closely homologous tyrosine kinases, such as Lck and c-Src. Because many structural features of the binding site are highly conserved in these highly homologous kinases, the molecular determinants responsible for the binding specificity of Gleevec remain poorly understood. To address this issue, free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations with explicit solvent was used to compute the binding affinity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src. The results of the FEP/MD calculations are in good agreement with experiments, enabling a detailed and quantitative dissection of the absolute binding free energy in terms of various thermodynamic contributions affecting the binding specificity of Gleevec to the kinases. Dominant binding free energy contributions arises from the van der Waals dispersive interaction, compensating about two-third of the unfavorable free energy penalty associated with the loss of translational, rotational, and conformational freedom of the ligand upon binding. In contrast, the contributions from electrostatic and repulsive interactions nearly cancel out due to solvent effects. Furthermore, the calculations show the importance of the conformation of the activation loop. Among the kinases examined, Abl provides the most favorable binding environment for Gleevec via optimal protein-ligand interactions and a small free energy cost for loss of the translational, rotational, and conformational freedom upon ligand binding. The FEP/MD calculations additionally reveal that Lck and c-Src provide similar non-binding interactions with the bound-Gleevec, but the former pays less entropic penalty for the ligand losing its translational, rotational, and conformational motions to bind, examining the empirically observed differential binding affinities of Gleevec between the two Src-family kinases.
机译:Gleevec是一种著名的癌症治疗剂,是几种酪氨酸激酶(包括Abl和c-Kit)的有效抑制剂。但是,它显示出抑制紧密同源的酪氨酸激酶(例如Lck和c-Src)的效力较低。因为在这些高度同源的激酶中结合位点的许多结构特征是高度保守的,所以对格列卫的结合特异性负责的分子决定簇仍然知之甚少。为了解决此问题,使用具有显式溶剂的自由能扰动分子动力学(FEP / MD)模拟来计算Gleevec与Abl,c-Kit,Lck和c-Src的结合亲和力。 FEP / MD计算的结果与实验非常吻合,从而可以根据影响Gleevec与激酶结合特异性的各种热力学贡献,对绝对结合自由能进行详细和定量的剖析。范德华分散相互作用产生了主要的结合自由能贡献,补偿了约三分之二的不利的自由能损失,这些损失与结合时配体的翻译,旋转和构象自由度丧失有关。相反,由于溶剂效应,静电和斥力相互作用的贡献几乎抵消了。此外,计算表明了激活环构象的重要性。在所检查的激酶中,Abl通过最佳的蛋白质-配体相互作用为格列卫提供了最有利的结合环境,并为配体结合后丧失了翻译,旋转和构象自由度提供了较小的自由能成本。 FEP / MD计算另外显示,Lck和c-Src与结合的Gleevec提供类似的非结合相互作用,但前者对配体失去其结合的平移,旋转和构象运动的结合所付出的熵损失较小,并进行了经验检验观察到两种Src家族激酶之间Gleevec的差异结合亲和力。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Yen-Lin Lin; Benoît Roux;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(135),39
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 14741–14753
  • 总页数 28
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号