首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Trait anxiety and trait anger measured by ecological momentary assessment and their correspondence with traditional trait questionnaires
【2h】

Trait anxiety and trait anger measured by ecological momentary assessment and their correspondence with traditional trait questionnaires

机译:生态瞬时评估测量的特质焦虑和特质愤怒及其与传统特质问卷的对应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of anxiety and anger/hostility were obtained every 25–30 minutes over two 24-hour periods, separated by a median of 6 months, from 165 employees at a university in the Northeast. We used a multilevel trait-state-error structural equation model to estimate: (1) the proportion of variance in EMA anxiety and anger/hostility attributable to stable trait-like individual differences; (2) the correspondence between these trait-like components of EMA anxiety and anger/hostility and traditional questionnaire measures of each construct; and (3) the test-retest correlation between two 24-hour averages obtained several months apart. After adjustment for measurement error, more than half the total variance in EMA reports of anxiety and anger/hostility is attributable to stable trait-like individual differences; however, the trait-like component of each construct is only modestly correlated with questionnaire measures of that construct. The 6-month “test-retest” correlations of latent variables representing the true 24-hour EMA average anxiety and average anger are quite high (r ≥ 0.83). This study represents the longest follow-up period over which EMA-based estimates of traits have been examined. The results suggest that although the trait component (individual differences) of EMA momentary ratings of anxiety and anger is larger than the state component, traditional self-report questionnaires of trait anxiety and anger correspond only weakly with EMA-defined traits.
机译:在东北部一所大学的165名员工中,在两个24小时内每25–30分钟获得一次焦虑和愤怒/敌意的生态瞬时评估(EMA),平均间隔为6个月。我们使用了一个多层次的特质-状态-错误结构方程模型来估计:(1)EMA焦虑和愤怒/敌意中的变异比例是由于稳定的特质样个体差异所致; (2)EMA焦虑和愤怒/敌对的这些特征样成分与每种结构的传统问卷测量之间的对应关系; (3)间隔数月获得的两个24小时平均值之间的重测相关性。调整测量误差后,EMA报告中焦虑和愤怒/敌对情绪的总差异中有一半以上归因于稳定的特质样个体差异。但是,每个构建体的特征样成分仅与该构建体的问卷调查量适度相关。代表真实的24小时EMA平均焦虑和平均愤怒的潜在变量的6个月“重新测试”相关性非常高(r≥0.83)。这项研究代表了最长的随访期,在此期间已检查了基于EMA的性状估计。结果表明,尽管EMA焦虑和愤怒瞬时评分的特质成分(个体差异)大于状态成分,但传统的自我报告性格焦虑和愤怒自我问卷仅与EMA定义的特质较弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号