首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Relevance of Testing the Efficacy of Anti-Angiogenesis Treatments on Cells Derived from Primary Tumors: A New Method for the Personalized Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
【2h】

The Relevance of Testing the Efficacy of Anti-Angiogenesis Treatments on Cells Derived from Primary Tumors: A New Method for the Personalized Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

机译:测试抗血管生成治疗对原发性肿瘤细胞的功效的相关性:个性化治疗肾细胞癌的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the numerous available drugs, the most appropriate treatments for patients affected by common or rare renal cell carcinomas (RCC), like those associated with the Xp11.2 translocation/transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3) gene fusion (TFE3 RCC), are not clearly defined. We aimed to make a parallel between the sensitivity to targeted therapies on living patients and on cells derived from the initial tumor. Three patients diagnosed with a metastatic RCC (one clear cell RCC [ccRCC], two TFE3 RCC) were treated with anti-angiogenesis drugs. The concentrations of the different drugs giving 50% inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50) were determined with the Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay on cells from the primary tumors and a reference sensitive RCC cell line (786-O). We considered the cells to be sensitive if the IC50 was lower or equal to that in 786-O cells, and insensitive if the IC50 was higher to that in 786-O cells (IC 50 of 6±1 µM for sunitinib, 10±1 µM for everolimus and 6±1 µM for sorafenib). Based on this standard, the response in patients and in cells was equivalent. The efficacy of anti-angiogenesis therapies was also tested in cells obtained from five patients with non-metastatic ccRCC, and untreated as recommended by clinical practice in order to determine the best treatment in case of progression toward a metastatic grade. In vitro experiments may represent a method for evaluating the best first-line treatment for personalized management of ccRCC during the period following surgery.
机译:尽管有许多可用的药物,但对于受普通或罕见肾细胞癌(RCC)影响的患者,如与Xp11.2易位/转录因子相关的免疫球蛋白重链增强子3(TFE3)基因融合(TFE3)的患者,最合适的治疗方法RCC),没有明确定义。我们的目标是在对活着的患者和源自最初肿瘤的细胞的靶向疗法的敏感性之间进行平行比较。对三名诊断为转移性RCC的患者(一个透明细胞RCC [ccRCC],两个TFE3 RCC)进行了抗血管生成药物治疗。通过噻唑基溴化四氮唑蓝(MTT)测定法测定原发性肿瘤细胞和参考敏感性RCC细胞系(786-O)的浓度,从而得出抑制细胞增殖(IC50)50%的不同药物浓度。如果IC50低于或等于786-O细胞,我们认为细胞是敏感的;如果IC50高于786-O细胞,则认为细胞不敏感(舒尼替尼的IC 50为6±1 µM,10±1依维莫司为µM,索拉非尼为6±1 µM)。根据该标准,患者和细胞中的反应均相等。还对5例非转移性ccRCC患者的细胞进行了抗血管生成疗法的疗效测试,并按照临床实践的建议进行了未经治疗的治疗,以确定在转移至转移级别时的最佳治疗方法。体外实验可能代表一种评估在手术后一段时间内对ccRCC进行个性化管理的最佳一线治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号