首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior >Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.
【2h】

Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.

机译:对事件持续时间的记忆理论的支持必须区分试验性歧义和实际记忆丧失。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Staddon and Higa's (1999) trace-strength theory of timing and memory for event duration can account for pigeons' bias to "choose short" when retention intervals are introduced and to "choose long" when, following training with a fixed retention interval, retention intervals are shortened. However, it does not account for the failure of pigeons to choose short when the intertrial interval is distinct from the retention interval. That finding suggests that stimulus generalization (or ambiguity) between the intertrial interval and the retention interval may result in an effect that has been attributed to memory loss. Such artifacts must be eliminated before a theory of memory for event duration can be adequately tested.
机译:Staddon和Higa(1999)对事件持续时间的计时和记忆的跟踪强度理论可以解释鸽子在引入保留间隔时倾向于“选择短”,而在以固定的保留间隔进行训练后“选择长”的偏见。时间间隔缩短了。但是,这不能解释当间隔间隔与保留间隔不同时,鸽子选择短的失败的原因。该发现表明,间质间隔和保留间隔之间的刺激性概括(或模糊性)可能导致归因于记忆力丧失的效应。必须充分消除此类伪像,然后才能对事件持续时间的记忆理论进行充分测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号