首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
【2h】

Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials

机译:硅烷和甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料对各种基础材料的粘结强度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) values of a methacrylate (FZ 250) and a silorane-based (FS) resin composite to various underlying materials. Materials and Methods. A total of 80 samples were prepared with four different underlying materials; a flowable (FLC) and a bulk-fill flowable composite (BFC), and a conventional (CGIC) and resin modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). These underlying materials were laminated plus to methacrylate or silorane-based resin composites (n = 10). To evaluate the specimens SBS values were evaluated with a universal testing machine (cross-head speed; 1.0 mm/min). Statistical comparisons were carried out using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results. SBS values for FZ250 were significantly higher than for FS for all of the underlying materials tested (P < 0.05). SBS values of FZ250 to BFC were significantly higher than to all other materials (P < 0.05), whereas SBS values of FS did not vary significantly according to underlying material (P > 0.05). Conclusion. The use of FS in conjunction with any of the tested materials showed lower SBS than the FZ 250. Also, new low elastic modulus liner BFC presented slightly good interfacial adhesion so, the usage of BFC as an underlying material may be preferable for FZ 250.
机译:目的。为了评估甲基丙烯酸酯(FZ 250)和基于硅烷的(FS)树脂复合材料对各种基础材料的剪切粘结强度(SBS)值。材料和方法。用四种不同的底层材料制备了总共80个样品。可流动的(FLC)和可填充的可流动复合材料(BFC),以及常规的(CGIC)和树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)。将这些基础材料层压到甲基丙烯酸酯或基于硅氧烷的树脂复合材料上(n = 10)。为了评估样品,使用通用测试仪(十字头速度; 1.0 mm / min)评估SBS值。使用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行统计学比较,显着性水平为P <0.05。结果。在所有测试的基础材料中,FZ250的SBS值均显着高于FS(P <0.05)。 FZ250到BFC的SBS值显着高于所有其他材料(P <0.05),而FS的SBS值根据基础材料没有显着变化(P> 0.05)。结论。 FS与任何被测材料的结合使用均显示出比FZ 250低的SBS。此外,新型低弹性模量衬里BFC的界面粘合性略好,因此对于FZ 250而言,使用BFC作为底层材料可能更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号