首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effectiveness of accommodation and constant resistance training on maximal strength and power in trained athletes
【2h】

Effectiveness of accommodation and constant resistance training on maximal strength and power in trained athletes

机译:适应和恒定阻力训练对训练有素的运动员的最大力量和力量的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accommodation resistance is a training technique that may improve strength and power gains beyond those achieved by traditional free weights. In this method, chains are either added on a free-weight bar and combined with traditional plates or added to the bar as the entire load.>Purpose. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of accommodation and constant resistance training methods during a four-week period on maximal strength and power in trained athletes.>Methods. This study was comprised of 24 trained athletes, including 16 trained males [8 Wushu athletes (Kung-Fu) and 8 wrestlers, age: 20.5 ± 2.00 yrs. old]. Participants were initially tested on weight, body circumference, fat percent, upper and lower body maximal strength, determined by the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test, which determines the greatest amount of weight a person can successfully lift, and upper and lower body power. Participants were equally randomized to either accommodation or constant resistance training groups. Both groups underwent resistance training for a four-week period that consisted of three sessions per week. Multivariate repeated-measures analyses of variance of the data were used to verify significant differences in strength and power between groups. The modified Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare the obtained results in pre-, mid-, and post test.>Results. In the accommodation resistance group, there was a significant difference in lower body maximal strength compared to the constant group (163.12 ± 18.82 kg in the accommodation group vs. 142.25 ± 20.04 kg in the constant group, P = 0.04). No significant differences were found in upper body power, lower body power, and upper body maximal strength between the two groups (P > 0.05).>Conclusion. Although there was only a significant difference in lower body maximal strength between groups, accommodation resistance training may induce a physiological training response by improving the strength and power of stabilizing muscle groups required to balance the bar if consistently used over time.
机译:适应阻力是一种训练技术,可以提高力量和力量的获得,超过传统的自由重量。在这种方法中,链条要么添加到自由重量的杆上,然后与传统的板结合,要么作为整个负载添加到杆上。>目的。本研究的目的是比较链条的有效性。在四个星期内针对受训运动员的最大力量和力量进行调节和恒定阻力训练的方法。>方法。本研究包括24名受过训练的运动员,其中包括16名受过训练的男性[8名武术运动员(Kung- Fu)和8位摔跤手,年龄:20.5±2.00岁。旧]。最初测试参与者的体重,体围,脂肪百分比,上,下半身最大力量,方法是通过1次最大重复(1RM)测试确定,该测试确定一个人可以成功举起的最大重量以及上半身和下半身功率。参与者均被随机分为适应性训练或恒定抵抗力训练组。两组均接受了为期四周的抵抗训练,每周接受三节训练。数据方差的多变量重复测量分析用于验证组之间力量和力量的显着差异。改良的Bonferroni post hoc测试用于比较测试前,测试中和测试后的结果。>结果。在适应性抵抗力组中,下半身最大力量与前者相比有显着差异恒定组(住宿组为163.12±18.82 kg,恒定组为142.25±20.04 kg,P = 0.04)。两组的上身力量,下身力量和上身最大力量之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。>结论。尽管下身最大力量仅有显着差异在各组之间,进行适应性阻力训练可通过提高稳定肌肉群的力量和力量来诱导生理训练反应,这些力量和力量可以使杠铃保持稳定,如果长时间持续使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号