首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Non-Destructive Lichen Biomass Estimation in Northwestern Alaska: A Comparison of Methods
【2h】

Non-Destructive Lichen Biomass Estimation in Northwestern Alaska: A Comparison of Methods

机译:阿拉斯加西北部的非破坏性地衣生物量估计:方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Terrestrial lichen biomass is an important indicator of forage availability for caribou in northern regions, and can indicate vegetation shifts due to climate change, air pollution or changes in vascular plant community structure. Techniques for estimating lichen biomass have traditionally required destructive harvesting that is painstaking and impractical, so we developed models to estimate biomass from relatively simple cover and height measurements. We measured cover and height of forage lichens (including single-taxon and multi-taxa “community” samples, n = 144) at 73 sites on the Seward Peninsula of northwestern Alaska, and harvested lichen biomass from the same plots. We assessed biomass-to-volume relationships using zero-intercept regressions, and compared differences among two non-destructive cover estimation methods (ocular vs. point count), among four landcover types in two ecoregions, and among single-taxon vs. multi-taxa samples. Additionally, we explored the feasibility of using lichen height (instead of volume) as a predictor of stand-level biomass. Although lichen taxa exhibited unique biomass and bulk density responses that varied significantly by growth form, we found that single-taxon sampling consistently under-estimated true biomass and was constrained by the need for taxonomic experts. We also found that the point count method provided little to no improvement over ocular methods, despite increased effort. Estimated biomass of lichen-dominated communities (mean lichen cover: 84.9±1.4%) using multi-taxa, ocular methods differed only nominally among landcover types within ecoregions (range: 822 to 1418 g m−2). Height alone was a poor predictor of lichen biomass and should always be weighted by cover abundance. We conclude that the multi-taxa (whole-community) approach, when paired with ocular estimates, is the most reasonable and practical method for estimating lichen biomass at landscape scales in northwest Alaska.
机译:陆地地衣生物量是北部地区驯鹿草料可供量的重要指标,并且可以指示由于气候变化,空气污染或维管植物群落结构变化而引起的植被转移。传统上,估算地衣生物量的技术要求进行破坏性的收获,这是艰苦而又不切实际的,因此,我们开发了模型来通过相对简单的覆盖和高度测量来估算生物量。我们测量了阿拉斯加西北部苏厄德半岛73个地点的饲草地衣(包括单分类群和多分类群“社区”样品,n = 144)的覆盖度和高度,并从同一地块收获了地衣生物量。我们使用零截距回归评估了生物量与体积的关系,并比较了两种非破坏性覆盖估计方法(目数与点数)之间,两个生态区中四种土地覆被类型之间以及单分类群与多类之间的差异。分类单元样本。此外,我们探索了使用地衣高度(而非体积)作为林分生物量预测指标的可行性。尽管地衣类群表现出独特的生物量和堆积密度响应,但随着生长形式的不同而发生显着变化,但我们发现单类群采样始终低估了真实生物量,并受到分类学专家的限制。我们还发现,尽管付出了更多的努力,但点数法与眼法相比几乎没有改善。使用多类群估算的地衣占主导的群落生物量(平均地衣覆盖率:84.9±1.4%),目测方法仅在生态区域内的土地覆盖类型之间名义上存在差异(范围:822至1418 g m −2 )。仅身高不能很好地预测地衣生物量,应始终通过覆盖物丰度对其加权。我们得出的结论是,多分类群(整个社区)方法与目测估计值相结合,是在阿拉斯加西北部景观尺度上估算地衣生物量的最合理,最实用的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号