首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Symptom assessment in early psychosis: The use of well-established rating scales in clinical high-risk and recent-onset populations
【2h】

Symptom assessment in early psychosis: The use of well-established rating scales in clinical high-risk and recent-onset populations

机译:早期精神病的症状评估:在临床高危人群和新近发病人群中使用公认的评分量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Symptom assessment in early psychosis research typically relies on scales validated in chronic schizophrenia samples. Our goal was to inform investigators who are selecting symptom scales for early psychosis research. We described measure characteristics, baseline scores, and scale inter-relationships in clinical high-risk (CHR) and recent-onset psychotic disorder (RO) samples using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; for the CHR group only, we included the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms. For investigators selecting symptom measures in intervention or longitudinal studies, we also examined the relationship of symptom scales with psychosocial functioning. In both samples, symptom subscales in the same domain, across measures, were moderately to highly intercorrelated. Within all measures, positive symptoms were not correlated with negative symptoms, but disorganized symptoms overlapped with both positive and negative symptoms. Functioning was significantly related to negative and disorganized, but not positive, symptoms in both samples on most measures. Findings suggest strong overlap in symptom severity ratings among the most common scales. In recent-onset samples, each has strengths and weaknesses. In CHR samples, they appear to add little information above and beyond the SOPS.
机译:早期精神病研究中的症状评估通常依赖于在慢性精神分裂症样本中验证的量表。我们的目标是告知正在为早期精神病研究选择症状量表的研究者。我们使用阳性和阴性综合征量表,简易精神病学量表,阳性评估量表描述了临床高风险(CHR)和新近发作的精神病性疾病(RO)样本中的量度特征,基线得分和量表之间的相互关系症状和阴性症状评估量表;仅对于CHR组,我们纳入了前驱症状量表。对于在干预或纵向研究中选择症状指标的研究者,我们还研究了症状量表与心理社会功能的关系。在这两个样本中,跨度量的同一域中的症状分量表的相关性中等至高度相关。在所有措施中,阳性症状与阴性症状无关,但杂乱无章的症状与阳性和阴性症状重叠。在大多数情况下,两个样品的功能均与阴性和杂乱无章的症状显着相关。研究结果表明,在最常见的量表中,症状严重程度评分存在高度重叠。在最近发作的样本中,每个样本都有优点和缺点。在CHR样本中,它们似乎在SOPS之上和之上几乎没有添加任何信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号