首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Insulin Pump Use and Glycemic Control in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): Predictors of Change in Method of Insulin Delivery across Two Years
【2h】

Insulin Pump Use and Glycemic Control in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): Predictors of Change in Method of Insulin Delivery across Two Years

机译:1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年的胰岛素泵使用和血糖控制:两年中胰岛素输送方法变化的预测指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Few studies have explored durability of insulin pump use, and none have explored the link between depression and pump discontinuation. To examine the relationship between depressive symptoms (measured by the Children’s Depression Inventory, CDI), method of insulin delivery, and A1c, mixed models were used with data from 150 adolescents with T1D and visits every 6 months for 2 years. Of the 63% who used a pump, compared to multiple daily injections (MDI) at baseline, there were higher proportions who were non-minorities, had caregivers with a college degree, private insurance, and two caregivers in the home (p≤0.01). After adjusting for time, sex, age, T1D duration, frequency of blood glucose monitoring, ethnicity, insurance, and caregiver number and education, baseline pump use was associated with −0.79% lower mean A1c (95% CI −1.48, −0.096; p=0.03). For those using a pump at baseline, but switching to MDI during the study (n=9), mean A1c was 1.38% higher (95% CI 0.68, 2.08; p<0.001) than that for those who did not switch method of delivery. A 10-point increase in CDI was associated with a 0.39% increase in A1c (95% CI 0.16, 0.61; p=0.001), independent of pump use. Regarding the temporal relationship between CDI score and changing method of insulin delivery, prior higher CDI score was associated with switching from pump to MDI (OR=1.21; 95% CI 1.05, 1.39 p=0.007). Clinicians should be aware of the associations between depressive symptoms, change in insulin delivery method, and the effect on glycemic control.
机译:很少有研究探讨使用胰岛素泵的持久性,也没有研究探讨抑郁症和泵停用之间的联系。为了检查抑郁症状(通过儿童抑郁量表,CDI进行测量),胰岛素输送方法和A1c之间的关系,我们使用混合模型对150名T1D青少年的数据进行了分析,并每6个月进行2年的随访。在使用泵的63%的人中,与基线时的每日多次注射(MDI)相比,非少数民族,有大学学历的看护者,私人保险和家庭中的两名看护者的比例更高(p≤0.01 )。在调整了时间,性别,年龄,T1D持续时间,血糖监测频率,种族,保险以及看护人数和教育程度之后,基线泵的使用使平均A1c降低了-0.79%(95%CI -1.48,-0.096; p = 0.03)。对于基线使用泵但在研究期间切换为MDI的患者(n = 9),平均A1c比未采用分娩方式的患者高1.38%(95%CI 0.68,2.08; p <0.001)。 。 CDI升高10点与A1c升高0.39%(95%CI 0.16,0.61; p = 0.001)有关,与泵的使用无关。关于CDI评分与改变胰岛素输送方法之间的时间关系,先前较高的CDI评分与从泵转为MDI相关(OR = 1.21; 95%CI 1.05,1.39 p = 0.007)。临床医生应了解抑郁症状,胰岛素输送方法的改变以及对血糖控制的影响之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号