首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Establishment and Validation of ALPH-Q Score to Predict Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure
【2h】

Establishment and Validation of ALPH-Q Score to Predict Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure

机译:建立并验证ALPH-Q评分以预测急性慢性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者的死亡风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Currently, there are no robust models for predicting the outcome of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF). We aimed to establish and validate a new prognostic scoring system, named ALPH-Q, that integrates electrocardiography parameters that may be used to predict short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF.Two hundred fourteen patients were included in this study. The APLH-Q score was constructed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and was validated in an independent patient cohort. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to compare the performance of different models, including APLH-Q, Child–Pugh score (CPS), model of end-stage liver disease (MELD), and a previously reported logistic regression model (LRM).The APLH-Q score was constructed with 5 independent risk factors, including age (HR = 1.034, 95% CI: 1.007–1.061), liver cirrhosis (HR = 2.753, 95% CI: 1.366–5.548), prothrombin time (HR = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.002–1.062), hepatic encephalopathy (HR = 2.703, 95% CI: 1.630–4.480), and QTc (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.001–1.016). The performance of the ALPH-Q score was significantly better than that of MELD and CPS in both the training (0.896 vs 0.712, 0.896 vs 0.738, respectively, both P < 0.05) and validation cohorts (0.837 vs 0.689, 0.837 vs 0.585, respectively, both P < 0.05). Compared with LRM, APLH-Q also showed a better performance (0.896 vs 0.825, 0.837 vs 0.818, respectively).We have developed a novel APLH-Q score with greater performance than CPS, MELD, and LRM for predicting short-term mortality of patients with ACHBLF.
机译:当前,尚无用于预测急性慢性乙型肝炎肝衰竭(ACHBLF)结果的可靠模型。我们旨在建立和验证一种名为ALPH-Q的新的预后评分系统,该系统整合了可用于预测ACHBLF患者短期死亡率的心电图参数。本研究纳入了214位患者。 APLH-Q评分通过Cox比例风险回归分析构建,并在独立的患者队列中进行了验证。接收者操作特征曲线下的区域用于比较不同模型的性能,包括APLH-Q,Child-Pugh评分(CPS),晚期肝病模型(MELD)和先前报道的逻辑回归模型(LRM)。APLH-Q评分由5个独立的危险因素构成,包括年龄(HR = 1.034,95%CI:1.007-1.061),肝硬化(HR = 2.753,95%CI:1.366-5.548),凝血酶原时间(HR = 1.031,95%CI:1.002–1.062),肝性脑病(HR = 2.703,95%CI:1.630–4.480)和QTc(HR = 1.008,95%CI:1.001–1.016)。在训练中(分别为0.896 vs 0.712、0.896 vs 0.738,P <0.05)和验证队列(分别为0.837 vs 0.689、0.837 vs 0.585),ALPH-Q评分的表现均显着优于MELD和CPS。 ,均P <0.05)。与LRM相比,APLH-Q也表现出更好的性能(分别为0.896 vs 0.825、0.837 vs 0.818)。 ACHBLF患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号