首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Validity of large-scale reading tests: A phenotypic and behaviour-genetic analysis
【2h】

Validity of large-scale reading tests: A phenotypic and behaviour-genetic analysis

机译:大规模阅读测试的有效性:表型和行为遗传分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Each year, all Australian students in grades 3, 5, 7, and 9 sit nationwide large-scale tests in literacy and numeracy, which have their validity frequently questioned. We compared the performance of Grade 3 twins on these large-scale reading tests with their performance on three individually administered literacy tests in comprehension, word reading and vocabulary within a genetically sensitive design. Comprehension, word reading, and vocabulary accounted for a substantial amount of the variance in school reading tests. Performance on large-scale reading tests and individually administered tests was moderately to substantially heritable and the same genes contributed to performance in both types of test. These results confirm that large-scale school reading tests measure, at least in part, the literacy skills tapped by individual tests that are frequently considered to be the “gold-standard” in testing.
机译:每年,所有3、5、7和9年级的澳大利亚学生都要参加全国性的识字和算术大型测验,这些测验的有效性经常受到质疑。我们比较了三级双胞胎在这些大型阅读测试中的表现与他们在遗传敏感设计中在理解,单词阅读和词汇方面的三个单独进行的识字测试的表现。在学校阅读测试中,理解力,单词阅读和词汇占很大的差异。在大规模阅读测试和单独进行的测试中的表现中等至基本可遗传,并且相同的基因在两种类型的测试中均发挥了作用。这些结果证实,大规模的学校阅读测验至少可以部分衡量个人测验所掌握的识字能力,这些测验通常被认为是测验中的“黄金标准”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号