首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does Habituation Differ in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects Compared to Pain-Free Controls? A Cross-Sectional Pain Rating ERP Study Reanalyzed with the ERFIA Multilevel Method
【2h】

Does Habituation Differ in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects Compared to Pain-Free Controls? A Cross-Sectional Pain Rating ERP Study Reanalyzed with the ERFIA Multilevel Method

机译:与无痛对照相比慢性腰背痛患者的习惯生活是否有所不同?用ERFIA多级方法重新分析跨部门疼痛评级ERP研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of the present study was to investigate cortical differences between chronic low back pain (CLBP) subjects and pain-free controls with respect to habituation and processing of stimulus intensity. The use of a novel event-related fixed-interval areas (ERFIA) multilevel technique enables the analysis of event-related electroencephalogram (EEG) of the whole post stimulus range at a single trial level. This technique makes it possible to disentangle the cortical processes of habituation and stimulus intensity.In a cross-sectional study, 78 individuals with CLBP and 85 pain-free controls underwent a rating paradigm of 150 nonpainful and painful somatosensory electrical stimuli. For each trial, the entire epoch was partitioned into 20-ms ERFIAs, which acted as dependent variables in a multilevel analysis. The variability of each consecutive ERFIA period was modeled with a set of predictor variables, including 3 forms of habituation and stimulus intensity.Seventy-six pain-free controls and 65 CLBP subjects were eligible for analysis. CLBP subjects showed a significantly decreased linear habituation at 340 to 460 ms in the midline electrodes and C3 (Ps < .05) and had a significantly more pronounced dishabituation for the regions of 400 to 460 ms and 800 to 820 ms for all electrodes, except for T3 and T4 (Ps < .05). No significant group differences for stimulus intensity processing were observed.In this study, group differences with respect to linear habituation and dishabituation were demonstrated. By means of the ERFIA multilevel technique, habituation effects were found in a broad post stimulus range and were not solely limited to peaks. This study suggests that habituation may be a key mechanism involved in the transition process to chronic pain. Future studies with a longitudinal design are required to solve this issue.
机译:本研究的目的是研究习惯性和刺激强度处理方面的慢性腰背痛(CLBP)受试者与无痛对照之间的皮质差异。使用新颖的事件相关固定间隔区域(ERFIA)多级技术可以在单个试验级别上分析整个刺激后范围的事件相关脑电图(EEG)。在一项横断面研究中,有78名具有CLBP和85个无痛对照的个体接受了150种无痛和痛苦的体感电刺激评分模式。对于每个试验,将整个时期划分为20毫秒的ERFIA,这些ERFIA在多级分析中充当因变量。使用一组预测变量对每个连续ERFIA周期的变异性进行建模,包括3种形式的习惯和刺激强度,其中66例无痛对照和65名CLBP受试者符合分析条件。 CLBP受试者的中线电极和C3在340至460μms处表现出线性习性显着降低(Ps <.05),并且除所有电极外,在400至460μms和800至820 ms范围内的显着更明显的异位对于T3和T4(Ps <0.05)。在刺激强度处理上没有观察到显着的群体差异。在这项研究中,证明了线性习惯和不适应方面的群体差异。通过ERFIA多级技术,在广泛的刺激后范围内发现了习惯效应,而不仅限于峰值。这项研究表明习惯化可能是向慢性疼痛过渡过程中涉及的关键机制。为了解决这个问题,需要对纵向设计进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号