首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Dynamic multi-segmental postural control in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain compared to pain-free controls: A cross-sectional study
【2h】

Dynamic multi-segmental postural control in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain compared to pain-free controls: A cross-sectional study

机译:与无痛对照相比慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的动态多节段体位控制:一项横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reduced postural control is thought to contribute to the development and persistence of chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). It is therefore frequently assessed in affected patients and commonly reported as the average amount of postural sway while standing upright under a variety of sensory conditions. These averaged linear outcomes, such as mean centre of pressure (CP) displacement or mean CP surface areas, may not reflect the true postural status. Adding nonlinear outcomes and multi-segmental kinematic analysis has been reported to better reflect the complexity of postural control and may detect subtler postural differences. In this cross-sectional study, a combination of linear and nonlinear postural parameters were assessed in patients with CNLBP (n = 24, 24-75 years, 9 females) and compared to symptom-free controls (CG, n = 34, 22-67 years, 11 females). Primary outcome was postural control measured by variance of joint configurations (uncontrolled manifold index, UI), confidence ellipse surface areas (CEA) and approximate entropy (ApEn) of CP dispersion during the response phase of a perturbed postural control task on a swaying platform. Secondary outcomes were segment excursions and clinical outcome correlates for pain and function. Non-parametric tests for group comparison with P-adjustment for multiple comparisons were conducted. Principal component analysis was applied to identify patterns of segmental contribution in both groups. CNLBP and CG performed similarly with respect to the primary outcomes. Comparison of joint kinematics revealed significant differences of hip (P < .001) and neck (P < .025) angular excursion, representing medium to large group effects (r′s = .36 − .51). Significant (P′s < .05), but moderate correlations of ApEn (r = -.42) and UI (r = -.46) with the health-related outcomes were observed. These findings lend further support to the notion that averaged linear outcomes do not suffice to describe subtle postural differences in CNLBP patients with low to moderate pain status.
机译:人们认为,姿势控制的减少有助于慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的发展和持续。因此,经常在受影响的患者中对其进行评估,并通常报告为在各种感官条件下直立时姿势摆动的平均量。这些平均线性结果,例如平均压力中心(CP)位移或平均CP表面积,可能无法反映真实的姿势状态。据报道,增加非线性结果和多段运动学分析可以更好地反映姿势控制的复杂性,并可以发现更微妙的姿势差异。在这项横断面研究中,评估了CNLBP患者(n = 24、24-75岁,9位女性)的线性和非线性姿势参数,并将其与无症状对照(CG,n = 34、22- 67岁,女性11岁)。主要结果是姿势控制,该姿势控制是通过在摆动的姿势控制任务在响应平台上的响应阶段中关节形态的变化(不受控制的歧管指数,UI),置信椭圆形表面积(CEA)和CP分散的近似熵(ApEn)来衡量的。次要结果是节段偏移,临床结果与疼痛和功能相关。进行了用于组比较的非参数检验,并进行了多次比较的P调整。应用主成分分析来确定两组的分段贡献模式。 CNLBP和CG在主要结局方面的表现相似。关节运动学的比较显示,髋部(P <.001)和颈部(P <.025)的角度偏移存在显着差异,代表中到大型组效应(r's = .36-.51)。观察到显着(P's <.05),但观察到ApEn(r = -.42)和UI(r = -.46)与健康相关的结果具有中等相关性。这些发现进一步支持了以下观点:平均线性结果不足以描述中低疼痛状态的CNLBP患者的细微姿势差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号