首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
【2h】

Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

机译:比伐卢定与肝素对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的评估:随机试验的荟萃分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin plus bail-out glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has been shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin plus routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing cardiac ischemic events, but with a lower bleeding risk. It is unknown whether bivalirudin would have the same beneficial effects if compared with heparin when the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was similar between treatment arms. We searched the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception until March 2015 for randomized trials that compared bivalirudin to heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We required that the intended use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was similar between the study groups. Summary estimates were principally constructed by the Peto method. Fifteen trials met our inclusion criteria, which yielded 25,824 patients. Bivalirudin versus heparin was associated with an increased hazard of stent thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.92, P = .002, I2 = 16.9%), with a similar hazard of myocardial infarction (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98-1.22, P = .11, I2 = 35.8%), all-cause mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.08, P = .21, I2 = 31.5%) and major adverse cardiac events (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.14, P = .46, I2 = 53.9%). Bivalirudin was associated with a reduced hazard of major bleeding (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92, P = .001, I2 = 63.5%). The dose of heparin in the control arm modified this association; when the dose of unfractionated heparin in the control arm was ≥ 100 units/kg, bivalirudin was associated with a reduction in major bleeding (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68, P < .0001), but when the dose of unfractionated heparin was ≤ 75 units/kg, bivalirudin was not associated with reduction in bleeding (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, P = .36). Among patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin was associated with an increased hazard of stent thrombosis. Bivalirudin may be associated with a reduced hazard of major bleeding; however, this benefit was no longer apparent when compared with a dose of unfractionated heparin ≤ 75 units/kg.
机译:经证明,比伐卢定加纾困糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与普通肝素加常规糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂在预防心脏缺血事件方面一样有效,但出血风险较低。当糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂的使用在治疗组之间相似时,如果比伐卢定与肝素相比是否具有相同的有益作用尚不清楚。从开始到2015年3月,我们在MEDLINE,Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中进行了搜索,以比较比伐卢定和肝素在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的随机试验。我们要求研究组之间糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂的预期用途相似。摘要估算主要通过Peto方法构造。共有15项试验符合我们的纳入标准,共产生25,824例患者。比伐卢定vs肝素与支架内血栓形成的危险性增加相关(赔率[OR] 1.49,95%置信区间[CI] 1.15-1.92,P = .002,I 2 = 16.9%),具有类似的心肌梗死危险(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.98-1.22,P = .11,I 2 = 35.8%),全因死亡率(OR 0.88,95%CI 0.72- 1.08,P = 0.21,I 2 = 31.5%)和主要不良心脏事件(OR 1.04,95%CI 0.94-1.14,P = 0.46,I 2 = 53.9%)。比伐卢定可以减少大出血的危险(OR 0.80,95%CI 0.70-0.92,P = .001,I 2 = 63.5%)。对照组中肝素的剂量改变了这种联系。当对照组的普通肝素剂量≥100单位/ kg时,比伐卢定可减少大出血(OR 0.55,95%CI 0.45-0.68,P <.0001),但当普通肝素剂量时≤75单位/ kg,比伐卢定与出血减少无相关性(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.91-1.31,P = 0.36)。在接受PCI的患者中,比伐卢定与支架内血栓形成的危险增加有关。比伐卢定可以减少大出血的危险;但是,与≤75单位/ kg的普通肝素相比,这种益处不再明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号