首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Role of Self-Sacrifice in Moral Dilemmas
【2h】

The Role of Self-Sacrifice in Moral Dilemmas

机译:自我牺牲在道德困境中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Centuries’ worth of cultural stories suggest that self-sacrifice may be a cornerstone of our moral concepts, yet this notion is largely absent from recent theories in moral psychology. For instance, in the footbridge version of the well-known trolley car problem the only way to save five people from a runaway trolley is to push a single man on the tracks. It is explicitly specified that the bystander cannot sacrifice himself because his weight is insufficient to stop the trolley. But imagine if this were not the case. Would people rather sacrifice themselves than push another? In Study 1, we find that people approve of self-sacrifice more than directly harming another person to achieve the same outcome. In Studies 2 and 3, we demonstrate that the effect is not broadly about sensitivity to self-cost, instead there is something unique about sacrificing the self. Important theoretical implications about agent-relativity and the role of causality in moral judgments are discussed.
机译:几百年来的文化故事表明,自我牺牲可能是我们道德观念的基石,但是这种观念在最近的道德心理学理论中却是缺失的。例如,在著名的手推车问题的人行天桥版本中,从失控的手推车中救出五个人的唯一方法是将一个人推上铁轨。明确规定,旁观者不能牺牲自己,因为他的体重不足以停止手推车。但是,如果不是这样,请想象一下。人们宁愿牺牲自己也不愿再推别人吗?在研究1中,我们发现人们赞成以牺牲自我为代价,而不是直接伤害他人以取得相同的结果。在研究2和3中,我们证明了影响并不广泛地体现在对自我成本的敏感性上,相反,牺牲自我具有一些独特之处。讨论了有关代理人相对性的重要理论意义以及因果关系在道德判断中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号