首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of Depletion Strategies for the Enrichment of Low-Abundance Proteins in Urine
【2h】

Comparison of Depletion Strategies for the Enrichment of Low-Abundance Proteins in Urine

机译:尿液中低丰度蛋白质富集耗竭策略的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Proteome analysis of complex biological samples for biomarker identification remains challenging, among others due to the extended range of protein concentrations. High-abundance proteins like albumin or IgG of plasma and urine, may interfere with the detection of potential disease biomarkers. Currently, several options are available for the depletion of abundant proteins in plasma. However, the applicability of these methods in urine has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we compared different, commercially available immunodepletion and ion-exchange based approaches on urine samples from both healthy subjects and CKD patients, for their reproducibility and efficiency in protein depletion. A starting urine volume of 500 μL was used to simulate conditions of a multi-institutional biomarker discovery study. All depletion approaches showed satisfactory reproducibility (n=5) in protein identification as well as protein abundance. Comparison of the depletion efficiency between the unfractionated and fractionated samples and the different depletion strategies, showed efficient depletion in all cases, with the exception of the ion-exchange kit. The depletion efficiency was found slightly higher in normal than in CKD samples and normal samples yielded more protein identifications than CKD samples when using both initial as well as corresponding depleted fractions. Along these lines, decrease in the amount of albumin and other targets as applicable, following depletion, was observed. Nevertheless, these depletion strategies did not yield a higher number of identifications in neither the urine from normal nor CKD patients. Collectively, when analyzing urine in the context of CKD biomarker identification, no added value of depletion strategies can be observed and analysis of unfractionated starting urine appears to be preferable.
机译:复杂的生物样品的蛋白质组分析以鉴定生物标志物仍然具有挑战性,其中包括蛋白质浓度范围的扩大。血浆和尿液中的白蛋白或IgG等高丰度蛋白质可能会干扰潜在疾病生物标志物的检测。当前,有几种选择可用于消耗血浆中丰富的蛋白质。然而,这些方法在尿液中的适用性尚未得到彻底研究。在这项研究中,我们比较了健康受试者和CKD患者尿液样品中可重复使用的基于商业耗竭和基于离子交换的方法的可重复性和蛋白质耗竭效率。起始尿量为500μL,用于模拟多机构生物标记物发现研究的条件。所有耗竭方法在蛋白质鉴定以及蛋白质丰度方面均显示令人满意的可重复性(n = 5)。比较未分级样品和分级样品之间的耗竭效率以及不同的耗竭策略,除离子交换试剂盒外,所有情况下均能有效耗竭。发现正常使用时的耗竭效率略高于CKD样品,当同时使用初始和相应的耗竭馏分时,正常样品比CKD样品产生更多的蛋白质鉴定。沿着这些路线,观察到耗尽后白蛋白和其他适用目标的数量减少。然而,这些耗竭策略在正常和CKD患者的尿液中均未获得更多的鉴定结果。集体地,当在CKD生物标志物鉴定的背景下分析尿液时,没有观察到耗竭策略的附加值,并且分析未分离的起始尿液似乎是优选的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号