首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
【2h】

LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method

机译:血清肌酐的LC-MS / MS方法:与酶法和Jaffe法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate quantification of creatinine (Cre) is important to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Differences among various methods of Cre quantification were previously noted. This study aims to develop a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for serum Cre and compare this method with clinical routine methods. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled with an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system. After adding isotope-labeled Cre-d3 as internal standard, serum samples were prepared via a one-step protein precipitation with methanol. The LC-MS/MS method was compared with frequently used enzymatic method and Jaffe method. This developed method, with a total run time of 3 min, had a lower limit of quantification of 4.4 μmol/L, a total imprecision of 1.15%–3.84%, and an average bias of 1.06%. No significant matrix effect, carryover, and interference were observed for the LC-MS/MS method. The reference intervals of serum Cre measured by LC-MS/MS assay were 41–79 μmol/L for adult women, and 46–101 μmol/L for adult men. Using LC-MS/MS as a reference, the enzymatic method showed an average bias of -2.1% and the Jaffe method showed a substantial average bias of 11.7%. Compared with the LC-MS/MS method, significant negative bias was observed for the enzymatic and Jaffe methods in hemolytic and lipimic samples. We developed a simple, specific, and accurate LC-MS/MS method to analyze serum Cre. Discordance existed among different methods.
机译:肌酐(Cre)的准确定量对于评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)很重要。先前已指出各种Cre定量方法之间的差异。本研究旨在开发一种用于血清Cre的液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS / MS),并将该方法与临床常规方法进行比较。 LC-MS / MS分析在API 4000三重四极杆质谱仪和Agilent 1200液相色谱系统上进行。加入同位素标记的Cre-d3作为内标后,通过用甲醇进行一步蛋白沉淀制备血清样品。将LC-MS / MS方法与常用的酶法和Jaffe方法进行了比较。这种开发的方法总运行时间为3分钟,定量下限为4.4μmol/ L,总不精密度为1.15%–3.84%,平均偏差为1.06%。 LC-MS / MS方法未观察到明显的基质效应,残留和干扰。通过LC-MS / MS分析测得的血清Cre的参考间隔,成年女性为41–79μmol/ L,成年男性为46–101μmol/ L。使用LC-MS / MS作为参考,酶法显示的平均偏差为-2.1%,Jaffe方法显示的平均偏差为11.7%。与LC-MS / MS方法相比,酶法和Jaffe方法在溶血和脂血样品中观察到显着的负偏差。我们开发了一种简单,特异性和准确的LC-MS / MS方法来分析血清Cre。不同方法之间存在不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号