首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The language faculty that wasnt: a usage-based account of natural language recursion
【2h】

The language faculty that wasnt: a usage-based account of natural language recursion

机译:语言系不是:基于用法的自然语言递归

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the generative tradition, the language faculty has been shrinking—perhaps to include only the mechanism of recursion. This paper argues that even this view of the language faculty is too expansive. We first argue that a language faculty is difficult to reconcile with evolutionary considerations. We then focus on recursion as a detailed case study, arguing that our ability to process recursive structure does not rely on recursion as a property of the grammar, but instead emerges gradually by piggybacking on domain-general sequence learning abilities. Evidence from genetics, comparative work on non-human primates, and cognitive neuroscience suggests that humans have evolved complex sequence learning skills, which were subsequently pressed into service to accommodate language. Constraints on sequence learning therefore have played an important role in shaping the cultural evolution of linguistic structure, including our limited abilities for processing recursive structure. Finally, we re-evaluate some of the key considerations that have often been taken to require the postulation of a language faculty.
机译:在生成传统中,语言系一直在萎缩-可能只包括递归机制。本文认为,即使是这种语言教师的观点也过于宽泛。我们首先争论说,语言系很难与进化考虑相协调。然后,我们将重点放在作为详细案例研究的递归上,认为我们处理递归结构的能力并不依赖于递归作为语法的一个属性,而是通过domain带领域通用序列学习能力而逐渐形成的。来自遗传学,关于非人类灵长类动物的比较工作以及认知神经科学的证据表明,人类已经发展了复杂的序列学习技能,随后被迫服从以适应语言。因此,对顺序学习的限制在塑造语言结构的文化发展过程中发挥了重要作用,包括我们处理递归结构的能力有限。最后,我们重新评估了通常需要假设语言学院的一些关键考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号