首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Using PET/CT Bone Scan Dynamic Data to Evaluate Tibia Remodeling When a Taylor Spatial Frame Is Used: Short and Longer Term Differences
【2h】

Using PET/CT Bone Scan Dynamic Data to Evaluate Tibia Remodeling When a Taylor Spatial Frame Is Used: Short and Longer Term Differences

机译:使用泰勒空间框架时使用PET / CT骨扫描动态数据评估胫骨重塑:短期和长期差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eighteen consecutive patients, treated with a Taylor Spatial Frame for complex tibia conditions, gave their informed consent to undergo Na18F PET/CT bone scans. We present a Patlak-like analysis utilizing an approximated blood time-activity curve eliminating the need for blood aliquots. Additionally, standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from dynamic acquisitions were compared to this Patlak-like approach. Spherical volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn to include broken bone, other (normal) bone, and muscle. The SUVm(t) (m = max, mean) and a series of slopes were computed as (SUVm(t i) − SUVm(t j))/(t i − t j), for pairs of time values t i and t j. A Patlak-like analysis was performed for the same time values by computing ((VOIp(t i)/VOIe(t i))−(VOIp(t j)/VOIe(t j)))/(t it j), where p = broken bone, other bone, and muscle and e = expected activity in a VOI. Paired comparisons between Patlak-like and SUVm slopes showed good agreement by both linear regression and correlation coefficient analysis (r = 84%, r s = 78%-SUVmax, r = 92%, and r s = 91%-SUVmean), suggesting static scans could substitute for dynamic studies. Patlak-like slope differences of 0.1 min−1 or greater between examinations and SUVmax differences of ~5 usually indicated good remodeling progress, while negative Patlak-like slope differences of −0.06 min−1 usually indicated poor remodeling progress in this cohort.
机译:连续接受泰勒空间镜架治疗复杂胫骨疾病的18例患者,在知情同意下接受了Na 18 F - PET / CT骨扫描。我们提出了利用近似的血液时间-活动曲线的类似Patlak的分析,消除了对血液等分试样的需要。此外,将来自动态采集的标准化摄取值(SUV)与类似Patlak的方法进行了比较。绘制感兴趣的球体体积(VOI),以包括骨折的骨头,其他(正常)骨头和肌肉。对于时间值ti和t j对,SUVm(t)(m =最大值,平均值)和一系列斜率计算为(SUVm(ti)-SUVm(tj))/(ti-tj)。 。通过计算((VOI p t i )/ VOI e < / em>( t i ))-(VOI p t j )/ VOI e t j )))/( t i - t j ),其中 p =损坏骨骼,其他骨骼和肌肉以及 e = VOI中的预期活动。通过线性回归和相关系数分析,类似Patlak和SUV m 坡度的配对比较显示出良好的一致性( r = 84%, r s = 78%-SUV max r = 92%, r s = 91%-SUV 平均值),这表明静态扫描可以代替动态研究。两次检查之间的Patlak样坡度差异为0.1 min -1 或更大,而SUV max 差异为〜5通常表示重塑进展良好,而负的Patlak状坡度差异为- 0.06 min -1 通常表明该队列的重塑进展较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号