首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information
【2h】

Contributions to a neurophysiology of meaning: the interpretation of written messages could be an automatic stimulus-reaction mechanism before becoming conscious processing of information

机译:对意义的神经生理学的贡献:书面信息的解释可能成为有意识地处理信息之前的自动刺激反应机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Even though the interpretation of natural language messages is generally conceived as the result of a conscious processing of the message content, the influence of unconscious factors is also well known. What is still insufficiently known is the way such factors work. We have tackled interpretation assuming it is a process, whose basic features are the same for the whole humankind, and employing a naturalistic approach (careful observation of phenomena in conditions the closest to “natural” ones, and precise description before and independently of data statistical analysis).>Methodology. Our field research involved a random sample of 102 adults. We presented them with a complete real world-like case of written communication using unabridged message texts. We collected data (participants’ written reports on their interpretations) in controlled conditions through a specially designed questionnaire (closed and opened answers); then, we treated it through qualitative and quantitative methods.>Principal Findings. We gathered some evidence that, in written message interpretation, between reading and the attribution of conscious meaning, an intermediate step could exist (we named it “disassembling”) which looks like an automatic reaction to the text words/expressions. Thus, the process of interpretation would be a discontinuous sequence of three steps having different natures: the initial “decoding” step (i.e., reading, which requires technical abilities), disassembling (the automatic reaction, an unconscious passage) and the final conscious attribution of meaning. If this is true, words and expressions would firstly function like physical stimuli, before being taken into account as symbols. Such hypothesis, once confirmed, could help explaining some links between the cultural (human communication) and the biological (stimulus-reaction mechanisms as the basis for meanings) dimension of humankind.
机译:>背景。尽管通常认为自然语言消息的解释是对消息内容进行有意识处理的结果,但无意识因素的影响也是众所周知的。这些因素的工作方式仍然未知。我们假设它是一个过程,它的基本特征对于整个人类都是相同的,因此我们已经处理了解释,并采用了自然主义的方法(在与“自然”条件最接近的条件下仔细观察现象,并在数据统计之前和与数据统计无关地进行精确描述)分析)。>方法学。我们的现场研究涉及102位成人的随机样本。我们为他们提供了一个完整的,类似于真实世界的使用未删节的消息文本进行书面交流的案例。我们通过专门设计的调查表(封闭式和开放式答案)在受控条件下收集了数据(参与者对他们的解释的书面报告);然后,我们通过定性和定量方法对其进行处理。>主要发现。。我们收集了一些证据,表明在书面信息解释中,阅读和有意识意义的归属之间可能存在中间步骤(我们将其命名为“拆卸”),看起来像是对文字单词/表达式的自动反应。因此,解释的过程将是具有不同性质的三个步骤的不连续序列:初始的“解码”步骤(即阅读,这需要技术能力),分解(自动反应,无意识的通过)和最终的有意识的归因意义。如果这是真的,那么在被视为符号之前,单词和表达式首先会像物理刺激一样起作用。这种假设一旦得到证实,就可以帮助解释人类的文化(人类交流)与生物学(作为意义的基础的刺激反应机制)之间的某些联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号