首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Placebo Devices as Effective Control Methods in Acupuncture Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Placebo Devices as Effective Control Methods in Acupuncture Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

机译:安慰剂设备作为针灸临床试验中的有效控制方法:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While the use of acupuncture has been recognised by the World Health Organisation, its efficacy for many of the common clinical conditions is still undergoing validation through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A credible placebo control for such RCTs to enable meaningful evaluation of its efficacy is to be established. While several non-penetrating acupuncture placebo devices, namely the Streitberger, the Park and the Takakura Devices, have been developed and used in RCTs, their suitability as inert placebo controls needs to be rigorously determined. This article systematically reviews these devices as placebo interventions. Electronic searches were conducted on four English and two Chinese databases from their inceptions to July 2014; hand searches of relevant references were also conducted. RCTs, in English or Chinese language, comparing acupuncture with one of the aforementioned devices as the control intervention on human participants with any clinical condition and evaluating clinically related outcomes were included. Thirty-six studies were included for qualitative analysis while 14 were in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis does not support the notion of either the Streitberger or the Park Device being inert control interventions while none of the studies involving the Takakura Device was included in the meta-analysis. Sixteen studies reported the occurrence of adverse events, with no significant difference between verum and placebo acupuncture. Author-reported blinding credibility showed that participant blinding was successful in most cases; however, when blinding index was calculated, only one study, which utilised the Park Device, seemed to have an ideal blinding scenario. Although the blinding index could not be calculated for the Takakura Device, it was the only device reported to enable practitioner blinding. There are limitations with each of the placebo devices and more rigorous studies are needed to further evaluate their effects and blinding credibility.
机译:尽管针灸的使用已获得世界卫生组织的认可,但其对许多常见临床疾病的功效仍在通过随机对照试验(RCT)进行验证。对于此类RCT,将建立可靠的安慰剂对照,以对其疗效进行有意义的评估。尽管已经开发出几种非穿透性针灸安慰剂设备,即Streitberger,Park和Takakura器械,并将其用于RCT中,但仍需要严格确定它们作为惰性安慰剂对照的适用性。本文系统地回顾了这些设备作为安慰剂的干预措施。从成立到2014年7月,我们对四个英文和两个中文数据库进行了电子搜索;还进行了相关参考文献的手工检索。包括英语或汉语的RCT,包括将针灸与上述设备之一进行比较,以作为对具有任何临床症状的人类参与者的对照干预措施,并评估临床相关结果。包括36项研究进行定性分析,而14项进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析不支持Streitberger或Park Device是惰性控制干预的概念,而荟萃分析中没有涉及高仓器械的任何研究。十六项研究报告了不良事件的发生,而普通针灸和安慰剂针灸之间没有显着差异。作者报告的盲法可信度表明,在大多数情况下,参与者盲法是成功的。但是,当计算盲目指数时,只有一项利用Park Device的研究似乎具有理想的盲目情景。尽管无法为Takakura设备计算盲目指数,但据报道它是唯一使从业者盲目化的设备。每种安慰剂装置都有局限性,需要更严格的研究以进一步评估其作用和盲目可信度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号