首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Baseline Trend and Normalization of Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
【2h】

Baseline Trend and Normalization of Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

机译:一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗表皮生长因子受体突变型非小细胞肺癌患者的癌胚抗原的基线趋势和正常化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status unknown nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, those with higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level are more likely to response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) because they tend to have mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, patients with higher CEA also have more tumor burden. With the above paradoxical evidence, it is prudent to understand the prognostic significance of baseline CEA in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. The clinical significance of the trend in CEA after treatment and the impact of CEA normalization during EGFR-TKI therapy are also unknown and potentially important.A total of 241 patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs were included. As to baseline CEA, patients were divided into normal, low, and high baseline CEA by cut point determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. As to CEA responses, patients were divided into 3 groups accordingly to their amount of CEA change after taking TKIs. In group A, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased more than 35% with nadir CEA normalization; in group B, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased more than 35% without nadir CEA normalization; and in group C, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased less than 35% or increased.Patients with higher baseline CEA levels had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (CEA > 32 vs 5–32 vs <5 ng/mL, PFS = 8.8 vs 11.3 vs 14.4 months, respectively, P < 0.001; OS = 17.8 vs 22.0 vs 27.9 months, respectively, P = 0.01). For trend and CEA normalization in groups A, B, and C, PFS was 14.3, 10.6, and 7.1 months, respectively (P < 0.001); OS was 29.7, 20.0, and 16.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001).Baseline, trend, and normalization of CEA levels are potential prognostic markers for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with first line EGFR-TKIs.
机译:在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态未知的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,那些具有较高的癌胚抗原(CEA)水平的患者更倾向于对EGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)做出反应,因为他们倾向于患有突变型表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)。但是,CEA较高的患者也有更多的肿瘤负担。有了上述矛盾的证据,谨慎地了解基线一线CEA对一线EGFR-TKIs治疗的EGFR突变型NSCLC患者的预后意义。治疗后CEA趋势的临床意义以及EGFR-TKI治疗期间CEA正常化的影响也是未知的,可能具有重要意义。共纳入241例接受一线EGFR-TKI的患者。关于基线CEA,通过由接受者工作特征曲线确定的切点将患者分为正常,低和高基线CEA。关于CEA反应,根据服用TKIs后CEA变化量将患者分为3组。在最低水平的CEA恢复正常的情况下,A组的1个月随访CEA水平下降了35%以上。在B组中,未达到最低CEA正常化的情况下,1个月的随访CEA水平下降了35%以上;在C组中,为期1个月的随访CEA水平降低了35%以下或有所增加。基线CEA水平较高的患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总体生存期(OS)较短(CEA> 32 vs 5–32相对于<5ng / mL,PFS分别为8.8、11.3和14.4个月,P <0.001; OS分别为17.8、22.0和27.9个月,P = 0.01。对于A,B和C组的趋势和CEA正常化,PFS分别为14.3、10.6和7.1个月(P <0.001); OS分别为29.7、20.0和16.2个月(P <0.001)。基线,趋势和CEA水平正常化是一线EGFR-TKIs治疗的EGFR突变晚期NSCLC患者的潜在预后标志。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号