首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pancreatic Amylase Value on Postoperative Day 1 After Pancreatic Resection to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula
【2h】

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pancreatic Amylase Value on Postoperative Day 1 After Pancreatic Resection to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

机译:胰腺切除术后第1天胰淀粉酶值的系统评价和Meta分析以预测术后胰瘘

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Early detection of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) may help to improve the outcome following pancreatic surgery, and exclusion of POPF may allow early drain removal which can accelerate recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of drain/plasma pancreatic amylase values on postoperative day 1 (DPA1/PPA1) in POPF by means of a systemic review and meta-analysis.Online journal databases and a manual search up to March 2015 were used. Studies clearly documenting DPA1 or PPA1 in predicting overall POPF (Grade 0 vs A+B+C) or clinically relevant POPF (Grade 0+A vs B+C) following pancreatic surgery were selected. Pooled predictive parameters were performed using STATA 12.0.Fifteen studies were finally identified with a total of 4331 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DPA1 were 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.96) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.64–0.86) for predicting overall POPF and 0.79 (95% CI 0.61–0.90) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.74–0.89) for predicting clinically relevant POPF. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PPA1 were 0.74 (95% CI 0.63–0.82) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70) for overall POPF. After the DPA1 at/over cutoff values for overall POPF or clinically relevant POPF, corresponding post-test probability (Post-test (+)) (if pretest probability was 50%) was 80% and 82% respectively, while, if values were below the cutoff values, the post-test probability (Post-test (−)) was 10% and 20% respectively. Post-test (+) and Post-test (−) of PPA1 for overall POPF were 66% and 30% respectively. In subgroup analysis, the summary sensitivities of cutoff <1000 group and cutoff >1000 group were 0.96 (0.92–0.98) and 0.85 (0.64–0.95), respectively; the summary specificities were 0.59 (0.44–0.72) and 0.86 (0.80–0.91) respectively. Positive LR were 2.3 (1.7–3.3) and 6.2 (3.7–10.2) respectively. Negative LR were 0.06 (0.03–0.14) and 0.18 (0.07–0.47) respectively.DPA1 is a useful predictive test for overall POPF and clinically relevant POPF which has good sensitivity and specificity based on the current studies. Meanwhile, it should be cautiously applied to clinical practice because cutoffs had a wide range between studies.
机译:早期发现术后胰瘘(POPF)可能有助于改善胰腺手术后的结局,排除POPF可以早期清除引流物,从而加速恢复。本研究的目的是通过系统回顾和荟萃分析评估POPF术后第1天(DPA1 / PPA1)的引流/血浆胰淀粉酶值的诊断准确性。在线期刊数据库和截至3月的手动搜索使用了2015年。选择了明确记录DPA1或PPA1预测胰腺手术后总体POPF(0级对A + B + C)或临床相关POPF(0 + A级对B + C)的研究。使用STATA 12.0进行汇总的预测参数。最终鉴定出15项研究,总计4331名患者。 DPA1的总敏感性和特异性分别为0.92(95%置信区间(CI)0.81-0.96)和0.77(95%CI 0.64-0.86)预测总体POPF以及0.79(95%CI 0.61-0.90)和0.83(95% CI 0.74–0.89),用于预测临床相关的POPF。对于整个POPF,PPA1的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.74(95%CI 0.63–0.82)和0.62(95%CI 0.55-0.70)。总体POPF或临床相关POPF的DPA1 at / over cutoff值之后,相应的测试后概率(post-test(+))(如果测试前概率为50%)分别为80%和82%,而如果低于临界值,测试后概率(测试后(-))分别为10%和20%。对于整个POPF,PPA1的测试后(+)和测试后(-)分别为66%和30%。在亚组分析中,临界值<1000组和临界值> 1000组的总敏感性分别为0.96(0.92-0.98)和0.85(0.64-0.95)。汇总特异性分别为0.59(0.44-0.72)和0.86(0.80-0.91)。阳性LR分别为2.3(1.7-3.3)和6.2(3.7-10.2)。阴性LR分别为0.06(0.03-0.14)和0.18(0.07-0.47)。DPA1是总体POPF和临床相关POPF的有用预测测试,根据当前的研究,它具有良好的敏感性和特异性。同时,由于研究之间的临界值范围很广,因此应谨慎地应用于临床实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号