The comprehension of sentences with unaccusative verbs in aphasia: a test of the intervener hypothesis

摘要

BackgroundIt is well accepted that individuals with agrammatic Broca’s aphasia have difficulty comprehending some sentences with filler-gap dependencies. While investigations of these difficulties have been conducted with several different sentence types (e.g., object relatives, Wh-questions), we explore sentences containing unaccusative verbs, which arguably have a single noun phrase (NP) that is base-generated in object position but then is displaced to surface subject position. Unaccusative verbs provide an ideal test case for a particular hypothesis about the comprehension disorder—the Intervener Hypothesis—that posits that the difficulty individuals with agrammatic Broca’s aphasia have comprehending sentences containing filler-gap dependencies results from similarity-based interference caused by the presence of an intervening NP between the two elements of a syntactic chain.