首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Combining and Comparing Coalescent Distance and Character-Based Approaches for Barcoding Microalgaes: A Test with Chlorella-Like Species (Chlorophyta)
【2h】

Combining and Comparing Coalescent Distance and Character-Based Approaches for Barcoding Microalgaes: A Test with Chlorella-Like Species (Chlorophyta)

机译:结合和比较基于条形码基于距离和基于字符的微藻条形码编码方法:一种类似于绿藻的物种(绿藻)的测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Several different barcoding methods of distinguishing species have been advanced, but which method is the best is still controversial. Chlorella is becoming particularly promising in the development of second-generation biofuels. However, the taxonomy of Chlorella–like organisms is easily confused. Here we report a comprehensive barcoding analysis of Chlorella-like species from Chlorella, Chloroidium, Dictyosphaerium and Actinastrum based on rbcL, ITS, tufA and 16S sequences to test the efficiency of traditional barcoding, GMYC, ABGD, PTP, P ID and character-based barcoding methods. First of all, the barcoding results gave new insights into the taxonomic assessment of Chlorella-like organisms studied, including the clear species discrimination and resolution of potentially cryptic species complexes in C. sorokiniana, D. ehrenbergianum and C. Vulgaris. The tufA proved to be the most efficient barcoding locus, which thus could be as potential “specific barcode” for Chlorella-like species. The 16S failed in discriminating most closely related species. The resolution of GMYC, PTP, P ID, ABGD and character-based barcoding methods were variable among rbcL, ITS and tufA genes. The best resolution for species differentiation appeared in tufA analysis where GMYC, PTP, ABGD and character-based approaches produced consistent groups while the PTP method over-split the taxa. The character analysis of rbcL, ITS and tufA sequences could clearly distinguish all taxonomic groups respectively, including the potentially cryptic lineages, with many character attributes. Thus, the character-based barcoding provides an attractive complement to coalescent and distance-based barcoding. Our study represents the test that proves the efficiency of multiple DNA barcoding in species discrimination of microalgaes.
机译:已经提出了几种不同的区分物种的条形码方法,但是哪种方法最好还是有争议的。小球藻在第二代生物燃料的开发中正变得特别有希望。但是,绿藻样生物的分类法很容易混淆。在这里我们报告了基于rbcL,ITS,tufA和16S序列的小球藻,绿藻,双球藻和放线菌的小球藻样物种的全面条形码分析,以测试传统条形码,GMYC,ABGD,PTP,P ID和基于字符的条形码的效率条码方法。首先,条形码结果为研究的小球藻样生物的分类学评估提供了新的见解,包括清楚地区分了种和区分了C. sorokiniana,D。ehrenbergianum和C. Vulgaris。事实证明, tufA 是最有效的条形码基因座,因此可以作为 Chlorella-类物种的潜在“特定条形码”。 16S未能区分最密切相关的物种。在 rbcL ,ITS和 tufA 基因之间,GMYC,PTP,P ID,ABGD和基于字符的条形码方法的分辨率是可变的。物种分化的最佳解决方案出现在 tufA 分析中,其中GMYC,PTP,ABGD和基于字符的方法产生了一致的组,而PTP方法过度分裂了类群。 rbcL ,ITS和 tufA 序列的字符分析可以清楚地区分所有分类组,包括潜在的隐性谱系,并具有许多字符属性。因此,基于字符的条形码为合并和基于距离的条形码提供了有吸引力的补充。我们的研究代表了一项测试,该测试证明了多种DNA条形码在微藻物种识别中的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号