首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Ad Hoc Influenza Vaccination During Years of Significant Antigenic Drift in a Tropical City With 2 Seasonal Peaks
【2h】

Ad Hoc Influenza Vaccination During Years of Significant Antigenic Drift in a Tropical City With 2 Seasonal Peaks

机译:在一个有两个季节性高峰的热带城市中重大抗原漂移年份中的临时流感疫苗接种

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We evaluated the acceptability of an additional ad hoc influenza vaccination among the health care professionals following seasons with significant antigenic drift.Self-administered, anonymous surveys were performed by hard copy questionnaires in public hospitals, and by an on-line platform available to all healthcare professionals, from April 1st to May 31st, 2015. A total of 1290 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaires, including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals working in both the public and private systems.Only 31.8% of participating respondents expressed an intention to receive the additional vaccine, despite that the majority of them agreed or strongly agreed that it would bring benefit to the community (88.9%), save lives (86.7%), reduce medical expenses (76.3%), satisfy public expectation (82.8%), and increase awareness of vaccination (86.1%). However, a significant proportion expressed concern that the vaccine could disturb the normal immunization schedule (45.5%); felt uncertain what to do in the next vaccination round (66.0%); perceived that the summer peak might not occur (48.2%); and believed that the summer peak might not be of the same virus (83.5%). Furthermore, 27.8% of all respondents expected that the additional vaccination could weaken the efficacy of previous vaccinations; 51.3% was concerned about side effects; and 61.3% estimated that there would be a low uptake rate. If the supply of vaccine was limited, higher priority groups were considered to include the elderly aged ≥65 years with chronic medical conditions (89.2%), the elderly living in residential care homes (87.4%), and long-stay residents of institutions for the disabled (80.7%). The strongest factors associated with accepting the additional vaccine included immunization with influenza vaccines in the past 3 years, higher perceived risk of contracting influenza, and higher perceived severity of the disease impact.The acceptability to an additional ad hoc influenza vaccination was low among healthcare professionals. This could have a negative impact on such additional vaccination campaigns since healthcare professionals are a key driver for vaccine acceptance. The discordance in perceived risk and acceptance of vaccination regarding self versus public deserves further evaluation.
机译:我们评估了在抗原明显漂移的季节之后,医护专业人员对额外的临时流感疫苗接种的可接受性,通过公立医院的纸质问卷和所有医疗机构均可使用的在线平台进行了自行管理的匿名调查专业人员,从2015年4月1日至5月31日。共有1290名医疗保健专业人员填写了问卷,包括在公共和私人系统中工作的医生,护士和专职医疗专业人员。只有31.8%的参与调查者表示有意接收尽管大多数人都同意或坚决同意它将为社区带来利益(88.9%),挽救生命(86.7%),减少医疗费用(76.3%),满足公众的期望(82.8%),但仍需要额外的疫苗,并提高了疫苗接种意识(86.1%)。但是,很大一部分人表示担心该疫苗会干扰正常的免疫程序(45.5%);不确定在下一轮疫苗接种中该做什么(66.0%);认为可能不会出现夏季高峰(48.2%);并认为夏季高峰可能不是同一病毒(83.5%)。此外,在所有被调查者中,有27.8%的人预计额外的疫苗接种会削弱以前的疫苗接种效果; 51.3%的人担心副作用;另有61.3%的人认为摄取率较低。如果疫苗的供应有限,则认为优先级较高的人群包括≥65岁且患有慢性疾病的老年人(89.2%),居住在养老院的老年人(87.4%)和长期住院的机构居民。残疾人(80.7%)。与接受其他疫苗相关的最强因素包括过去3年使用流感疫苗进行的免疫接种,感冒感染流感的风险较高以及对疾病影响的感知严重程度较高。医疗保健专业人员对额外的临时流感疫苗的接受度较低。这可能会对此类额外的疫苗接种活动产生负面影响,因为医疗保健专业人员是疫苗接受的主要推动力。自我和公众之间在感知风险和接受疫苗接种方面的不一致值得进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号