首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Identification of High-Risk Subgroups of Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer in Need of Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy or Chemo-Radiotherapy
【2h】

Identification of High-Risk Subgroups of Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer in Need of Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy or Chemo-Radiotherapy

机译:需要手术后放疗或化学放疗的口腔癌患者高危亚组的鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing surgery are recommended to receive adjuvant radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy if there are unfavorable prognostic factors. A positive resection margin (PRM) and extra-capsular extension (ECE) of lymph nodes are well-known major prognostic factors. However, there is no agreement on whether oral cavity cancer patients should receive postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) if they present with other risk factors or a combination of 2 or more risk factors. In this study, we investigated this issue and provide suggestions for adjuvant treatments.From January 2002 to December 2013, 567 OSCC patients who had undergone radical surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The 5-year loco-regional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free (DMF), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.In univariate analysis, pathological T classification, positive node, tumor depth, ECE, lymphatic or vascular or perineural invasion and histology grade are significant prognostic factors for LRC, DMF, DFS, or OS. By multivariate analysis, pathological T4 (pT4), positive node, positive surgical margin are prognostic factors for LRC. pT4, positive node and lymphatic invasion predicted for higher rate of distant metastasis. pT4, positive node, and poor differentiation tumor were prognostic factors for DFS. pT4, positive nodes, and ECE were prognostic factors for OS. These factors were used to define risk groups. We proposed PRM and ECE as major risk factors and pT4, positive nodes, close margin (≤ 5 mm, > 1 mm), tumor depth ≥ 1 cm, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and poor differentiation as minor risk factors. By subgroups analysis, 192 patients with at least 2 minor prognostic factors and no other major risk factors, postoperative radiotherapy (RT), or CCRT yielded significantly better 5-year LRC, DFS, and OS compared to surgery only group. For 179 patients with at least 3 minor prognostic factors and/or at least 1 major risk factor, patients receiving postoperative CCRT showed significantly better 5-year LRC, DFS, and OS compared with post-OP RT or surgery alone.Patients with 2 minor risk factors should receive postoperative RT. For patients with PRM, ECE, or >2 minor risk factors, postoperative CCRT is recommended.
机译:如果有不利的预后因素,建议接受手术的口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者接受辅助放疗,无论是否接受化疗。淋巴结的阳性切除切缘(PRM)和包膜外延伸(ECE)是众所周知的主要预后因素。但是,对于口腔癌患者是否存在其他危险因素或两种或多种危险因素的组合,是否应该接受术后放射化学疗法(CCRT)尚无共识。在这项研究中,我们调查了这个问题并提供了辅助治疗的建议.2002年1月至2013年12月,对567例接受了根治性手术的OSCC患者进行了回顾性研究。分析了5年局部区域对照(LRC),无远处转移(DMF),无病生存(DFS)和总体生存(OS)。单因素分析包括病理T分类,阳性结节,肿瘤深度,ECE,淋巴或血管或神经周浸润和组织学分级是LRC,DMF,DFS或OS的重要预后因素。通过多变量分析,病理T4(pT4),阳性淋巴结,手术切缘阳性是LRC的预后因素。 pT4,阳性淋巴结和淋巴管浸润预测远处转移率更高。 pT4,阳性淋巴结和分化不良的肿瘤是DFS的预后因素。 pT4,阳性淋巴结和ECE是OS的预后因素。这些因素用于定义风险组。我们建议将PRM和ECE作为主要危险因素,并将pT4,阳性淋巴结,闭合边缘(≤5 mm,> 1 mm),肿瘤深度≥1 cm,淋巴管浸润,血管浸润,神经周浸润和分化不良作为次要危险因素。通过亚组分析,与单纯手术组相比,有至少2个次要预后因素且无其他主要危险因素,术后放疗(RT)或CCRT的192例患者的5年LRC,DFS和OS明显好于单纯手术组。对于179位至少有3个次要预后因素和/或至少1个主要危险因素的患者,接受术后CCRT的患者的5年LRC,DFS和OS显着优于仅接受OP RT或单独手术的患者。危险因素应接受术后放疗。对于PRM,ECE或> 2个较小危险因素的患者,建议术后进行CCRT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号