首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Systematic Review of Published Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys Collecting Behavioral and BiologicData
【2h】

A Systematic Review of Published Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys Collecting Behavioral and BiologicData

机译:对已发表的由行为驱动的抽样调查收集行为和生物学的系统评价数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reporting key details of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) survey implementation and analysis is essential for assessing the quality of RDS surveys. RDS is both a recruitment and analytic method and, as such, it is important to adequately describe both aspects in publications. We extracted data from peer-reviewed literature published through September, 2013 that reported collected biological specimens using RDS. We identified 151 eligible peer-reviewed articles describing 222 surveys conducted in seven regions throughout the world. Most published surveys reported basic implementation information such as survey city, country, year, population sampled, interview method, and final sample size. However, many surveys did not report essential methodological and analytical information for assessing RDS survey quality, including number of recruitment sites, seeds at start and end, maximum number of waves, and whether data were adjusted for network size. Understanding the quality of data collection and analysis in RDS is useful for effectively planning public health service delivery and funding priorities.
机译:报告响应者驱动抽样(RDS)调查实施和分析的关键细节对于评估RDS调查的质量至关重要。 RDS既是招募又是分析方法,因此,重要的是在出版物中充分描述这两个方面。我们从截至2013年9月发表的同行评审文献中提取了数据,这些文献报告了使用RDS收集的生物学标本。我们确定了151篇经过同行评审的合格文章,这些文章描述了在全球七个地区进行的222项调查。大多数已发布的调查报告了基本的实施信息,例如调查城市,国家/地区,年份,抽样人群,访谈方法和最终抽样规模。但是,许多调查并没有报告评估RDS调查质量的基本方法和分析信息,包括招聘地点的数量,开始和结束时的种子数量,最大海浪数量以及是否针对网络规模调整了数据。了解RDS中数据收集和分析的质量对于有效规划公共卫生服务提供和资金优先事项很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号