首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >No Evidence of Trade-Off between Farm Efficiency and Resilience: Dependence of Resource-Use Efficiency on Land-Use Diversity
【2h】

No Evidence of Trade-Off between Farm Efficiency and Resilience: Dependence of Resource-Use Efficiency on Land-Use Diversity

机译:没有证据表明农场效率与弹性之间存在折衷关系:资源利用效率对土地利用多样性的依赖

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Efficiency in the use of resources stream-lined for expected conditions could lead to reduced system diversity and consequently endanger resilience. We tested the hypothesis of a trade-off between farm resource-use efficiency and land-use diversity. We applied stochastic frontier production models to assess the dependence of resource-use-efficiency on land-use diversity as illustrated by the Shannon-Weaver index. Total revenue in relation to use of capital, land and labour on the farms in Southern Finland with a size exceeding 30 ha was studied. The data were extracted from the Finnish Profitability Bookkeeping data. Our results indicate that there is either no trade-off or a negligible trade-off of no economic importance. The small dependence of resource-use efficiency on land-use diversity can be positive as well as negative. We conclude that diversification as a strategy to enhance farm resilience does not necessarily constrain resource-use efficiency.
机译:在预期条件下精简使用资源的效率可能会导致系统多样性减少,从而危害弹性。我们检验了农场资源利用效率与土地利用多样性之间权衡的假设。我们应用了随机前沿生产模型来评估资源利用效率对土地利用多样性的依赖性,如Shannon-Weaver指数所示。研究了在芬兰南部超过30公顷的农场中与使用资本,土地和劳动力有关的总收入。该数据是从芬兰盈利能力簿记数据中提取的。我们的结果表明,要么没有权衡,要么没有经济重要性的可忽略不计的权衡。资源利用效率对土地利用多样性的小依赖性既可以是正面的,也可以是负面的。我们得出的结论是,将多样化作为提高农场抗灾力的策略并不一定会限制资源利用效率。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Helena Kahiluoto; Janne Kaseva;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(11),9
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0162736
  • 总页数 16
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号