首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Feasibility and Safety of Evaluating Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Disease Using an Accelerated Diagnostic Algorithm in a Chest Pain Unit
【2h】

Feasibility and Safety of Evaluating Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Disease Using an Accelerated Diagnostic Algorithm in a Chest Pain Unit

机译:在胸痛病房中使用加速诊断算法评估先前有冠状动脉疾病的患者的可行性和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An accelerated diagnostic protocol for evaluating low-risk patients with acute chest pain in a cardiologist-based chest pain unit (CPU) is widely employed today. However, limited data exist regarding the feasibility of such an algorithm for patients with a history of prior coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility and safety of evaluating patients with a history of prior CAD using an accelerated diagnostic protocol. We evaluated 1,220 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain and hospitalized in our CPU. Patients were stratified according to whether they had a history of prior CAD or not. The primary composite outcome was defined as a composite of readmission due to chest pain, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, or death during a 60-day follow-up period. Overall, 268 (22%) patients had a history of prior CAD. Non-invasive evaluation was performed in 1,112 (91%) patients. While patients with a history of prior CAD had more comorbidities, the two study groups were similar regarding hospitalization rates (9% vs. 13%, p = 0.08), coronary angiography (13% vs. 11%, p = 0.41), and revascularization (6.5% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.8) performed during CPU evaluation. At 60-days the primary endpoint was observed in 12 (1.6%) and 6 (3.2%) patients without and with a history of prior CAD, respectively (p = 0.836). No mortalities were recorded. To conclude, Patients with a history of prior CAD can be expeditiously and safely evaluated using an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a CPU with outcomes not differing from patients without such a history.
机译:如今,已广泛使用一种加速诊断方案来评估基于心脏病专家的胸痛单元(CPU)中的急性胸痛的低风险患者。然而,关于这种算法对有既往冠心病(CAD)病史的患者的可行性的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估使用加速诊断方案评估具有既往CAD史的患者的可行性和安全性。我们评估了1,220例连续出现急性胸痛并在我们的CPU中住院的患者。根据患者是否有既往CAD史对其进行分层。主要的综合结局定义为在60天的随访期内因胸痛,急性冠脉综合征,冠状动脉血运重建或死亡而导致的再入院。总体而言,有268位(22%)患者有过先前的CAD病史。在1,112名(91%)患者中进行了非侵入性评估。虽然有既往CAD史的患者合并症更多,但两个研究组的住院率(9%比13%,p = 0.08),冠状动脉造影(13%比11%,p = 0.41)和相似。在CPU评估期间进行了血运重建(6.5%vs. 5.7%,p = 0.8)。在60天时,分别观察到12例(1.6%)和6例(3.2%)无或有既往CAD史的患者的主要终点(p = 0.836)。没有死亡记录。总而言之,可以使用CPU中的加速诊断方案对具有既往CAD病史的患者进行快速安全的评估,其结果与没有此类病史的患者无异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号