首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >FURTHER ANALYSIS OF SUBTYPES OF AUTOMATICALLY REINFORCED SIB: A REPLICATION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATASETS
【2h】

FURTHER ANALYSIS OF SUBTYPES OF AUTOMATICALLY REINFORCED SIB: A REPLICATION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATASETS

机译:自动增强的SIB的子类型的进一步分析:已发布数据集的复制和定量分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.
机译:基于其对功能分析条件变化的敏感性和自我约束的存在,评估了一种用于自动分型自动增强自我伤害行为(SIB)的模型。当前的研究通过将模型应用于1982年至2015年发布的自动增强型SIB的所有数据集来测试该模型的一般性。我们确定了49个数据集,其中包括足以进行子分型的数据。与原始研究相似,Subtype-1 SIB通常适合单独使用增强剂进行治疗,而Subtype-2 SIB则不能。由于数据集数量少,无法得出关于亚型3 SIB的结论。然而,这些发现支持了该模型的一般性,并暗示了SIB对替代加固破坏的敏感性是自动加固SIB的重要方面。研究结果还表明,自动加固的SIB不应再被视为单一类别,需要进行更多的研究以更好地理解和治疗2型SIB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号