首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with slow-transit constipation: A randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with slow-transit constipation: A randomized clinical trial

机译:慢传递性便秘患者的粪便菌群移植:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fecal microbiota transplantation has been proposed as a therapeutic approach for chronic constipation. This randomized, controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of conventional treatment alone (control) with additional treatment with FMT (intervention) in patients with slow-transit constipation (STC). Adults with STC were randomized to receive intervention or control treatment. The control group received education, behavioral strategies, and oral laxatives. The intervention group was additionally provided 6 days of FMT. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate (proportion of patients achieving a mean of ≥ three complete spontaneous bowel movements [CSBMs] per week]. Secondary outcomes and safety parameters were assessed throughout the study. Sixty patients were randomized to either conventional treatment alone (n = 30) or FMT (n = 30) through a nasointestinal tube. There were significant differences between the intervention group and control group in the clinical improvement rate (intention-to-treat [ITT]: 53.3% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.009), clinical cure rate (ITT: 36.7% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04), mean number of CSBMs per week (ITT: 3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.2, P = 0.001), and the Wexner constipation score (ITT: 8.6 ± 1.5 vs. 12.7 ± 2.5, P < 0.00001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed better results in the stool consistency score (ITT: 3.9 vs. 2.4, P < 0.00001) and colonic transit time (ITT: 58.5 vs. 73.6 h, P < 0.00001). The intervention group had more treatment-related adverse events than did the control group (50 vs. 4 cases). FMT was significantly more effective (30% higher cure rate) for treatment of STC than conventional treatment. No serious adverse events were observed.
机译:粪便菌群移植已被提议作为慢性便秘的治疗方法。这项随机对照试验旨在比较常规治疗(对照)与FMT额外治疗(干预)对慢通便秘(STC)患者的疗效。患有STC的成人被随机接受干预或对照治疗。对照组接受教育,行为策略和口服泻药。干预组还额外接受了6天的FMT。主要终点为临床治愈率(每周平均≥3次完全自发排便[CSBMs]的患者比例]。在整个研究中评估了次要结局和安全性参数。60例患者被随机分配到任一常规治疗中( n = 30)或通过鼻肠管进行FMT(n = 30),干预组与对照组的临床改善率有显着差异(意向性治疗[ITT]:53.3%vs. 20.0%,P = 0.009),临床治愈率(ITT:36.7%vs. 13.3%,P = 0.04),平均每周CSBM数量(ITT:3.2±1.4 vs. 2.1±1.2,P = 0.001)和韦克斯纳便秘评分(ITT:8.6±1.5 vs. 12.7±2.5,P <0.00001)。与对照组相比,干预组在粪便一致性评分(ITT:3.9 vs. 2.4,P <0.00001)和结肠通过时间方面显示出更好的结果(ITT:58.5 vs. 73.6 h,P <0.00001)。干预组的治疗相关不良反应更多通风口比对照组(50例vs. 4例)高。 FMT对STC的治疗比常规治疗显着更有效(治愈率高30%)。没有观察到严重的不良事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号