首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Preload-based Starling-like control of rotary blood pumps: An in-vitro evaluation
【2h】

Preload-based Starling-like control of rotary blood pumps: An in-vitro evaluation

机译:基于预加载的类似Starling的旋转血泵控制:体外评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Due to a shortage of donor hearts, rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used to provide mechanical circulatory support. To address the preload insensitivity of the constant speed controller (CSC) used in conventional LVADs, we developed a preload-based Starling-like controller (SLC). The SLC emulates the Starling law of the heart to maintain mean pump flow (QP¯) with respect to mean left ventricular end diastolic pressure (PLVEDm) as the feedback signal. The SLC and CSC were compared using a mock circulation loop to assess their capacity to increase cardiac output during mild exercise while avoiding ventricular suction (marked by a negative PLVEDm) and maintaining circulatory stability during blood loss and severe reductions in left ventricular contractility (LVC). The root mean squared hemodynamic deviation (RMSHD) metric was used to assess the clinical acceptability of each controller based on pre-defined hemodynamic limits. We also compared the in-silico results from our previously published paper with our in-vitro outcomes. In the exercise simulation, the SLC increased QP¯ by 37%, compared to only 17% with the CSC. During blood loss, the SLC maintained a better safety margin against left ventricular suction with PLVEDm of 2.7 mmHg compared to -0.1 mmHg for CSC. A transition to reduced LVC resulted in decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and QP¯ with CSC, whilst the SLC maintained MAP and QP¯. The results were associated with a much lower RMSHD value with SLC (70.3%) compared to CSC (225.5%), demonstrating improved capacity of the SLC to compensate for the varying cardiac demand during profound circulatory changes. In-vitro and in-silico results demonstrated similar trends to the simulated changes in patient state however the magnitude of hemodynamic changes were different, thus justifying the progression to in-vitro evaluation.
机译:由于供体心脏不足,因此使用旋转左心室辅助设备(LVAD)提供机械循环支持。为了解决常规LVAD中使用的恒速控制器(CSC)的预紧不灵敏性,我们开发了基于预紧力的Starling类控制器(SLC)。 SLC模仿心脏的Starling定律,以维持平均泵流量( < mrow> Q P 。< / mo> )作为平均左心室舒张末期压力(PLVEDm)作为反馈信号。使用模拟循环回路对SLC和CSC进行比较,以评估其在轻度运动过程中增加心排血量的能力,同时避免心室吸引(以PLVEDm为负值)并在失血期间维持循环稳定性以及严重降低左心室收缩力(LVC) 。均方根血液动力学偏差(RMSHD)度量标准用于根据预定义的血液动力学限值评估每个控制器的临床可接受性。我们还比较了以前发表的论文的计算机模拟结果和体外结果。在运动模拟中,SLC增加了 Q P 增长了37%,而CSC仅为17%。在失血期间,与CSC的-0.1 mmHg相比,PLVEDm为2.7 mmHg的SLC保持了更好的抗左室吸引的安全余量。向降低的LVC过渡导致平均动脉压(MAP)和 < mrow> Q P 。< / mo> 与CSC,而SLC维护MAP和 Q P < mo Stretchy =“ true”>¯ 。与CSC(225.5%)相比,SLC的RMSHD值(70.3%)低得多,这表明SLC能够更好地补偿深度循环变化时心脏需求的变化。体外和计算机模拟结果显示出与患者状态的模拟变化相似的趋势,但是血液动力学变化的幅度不同,从而证明了进行体外评估的合理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号